SKU: 30546221018

HS7007-E-T-P4S-UL FAG

Sale price$98.18 Regular price$109.09
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $27.27 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 24 - Jul 29

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

HS7007-E-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0380447060000 Auendurchmesser: 62 mm Gewicht: 169 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 62,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 14,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 14,00 E 25 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 17 Innenmae: mm

Technische Basisdaten

Hersteller: FAG
Synonym: 0380447060000
Außendurchmesser: 62 mm
Gewicht: 169 Gramm
Herstellungsland: Deutschland
Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung
Spannung: geringe Spannung
Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090


Erweiterte technische Daten

Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 62,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 14,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 14,00
E 25° Contact Angle
ECLASS number 23-05-08-03
ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03
Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.17
Innenmaße: mm 35,00
P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9
Paarung G – Universelle Paarung
Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4)
Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 8400
Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 4700
T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C
UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload
Abhebekraft leicht: 146 N
Abhebekraft schwer: 915 N
Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 18,3 mm
Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12
Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 41 mm
Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 67,7 N/µm
Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 132 N/µm
Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C
Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C
C 0r 4.700 N Statische Tragzahl, radial
C r 8.400 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial
C ur 500 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial
D 62 mm Außendurchmesser
Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 8.400 N
E tk max 46,8 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis
E tk min 45,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis
E tk1 max 46,8 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis
E tk1 min 43,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis
Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 500 N
F V H 304 N Vorspannkraft schwer
F V L 51 N Vorspannkraft leicht
K aE H 915 N Abhebekraft schwer
K aE L 146 N Abhebekraft leicht
Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 46,8 mm
Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,3 mm
Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm
Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 43,9 mm
Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 45,7 mm
Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1 mm
Statische Tragzahl, radial: 4.700 N
T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max.
T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min.
Vorspannkraft leicht: 51 N
Vorspannkraft schwer: 304 N
a 18,3 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze
c a H 132 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer
c a L 67,7 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht
d =a 41 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter
d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung
r 1 min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
r a max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r a1 max 0,3 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
≈m 0,156 kg Einzelgewicht
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 30546221018

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
G
Verified Purchase
Grandma
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 4
Large clutch purse!
I was surprised at how large this clutch purse is. It is roomy. It seems sturdy. If you want a hand size clutch this isn't it, but if you like closer to a small purse this is more the size. I will be using it for a family gathering and can't wait to use it with my coordinated sunglasses and outfit! Definitely a good price!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 8, 2024
V
Verified Purchase
Victoria C. White
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Silver chain isn’t great but love the clutch!
Color: Khaki
I needed a simple clutch to match silver jewelry, I’m really happy with this one. Doesn’t fit much but has two magnetic clasps to keep your things safe. The silver chain was too industrial almost looked like metal fencing - I trashed it, but the silver handle is beautiful as a clutch.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2024
C
Verified Purchase
Cena Martin
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Must have!
This bag is stunning. High quality. It also has a beautiful gold chain. Totally dressed up my outfit for a evening in Nashville. So many compliments.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2024
A
Verified Purchase
Adri
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Very pretty
This clutch is very pretty. Definitely a "going out" to an event clutch/bag. The silver handle and chain are beautiful. My only struggle is the size. You cannot fit a lot of stuff in here. But, this would be a "special event" bag, so, you really aren't going to walk around with your every day necessities in this bag. You can fit a cell phone, lipstick, a super slim credit card holder, that hold a credit card/s and bank card/s. If you try to put more things in here, it will not close. I do still recommend 100%. It's a really, really pretty bag.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 9, 2023
A
Verified Purchase
Ange32004
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 3
I returned it
Cute purse, but the material used was cheap-looking. The storage and size were great, but the material .... not so good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2025

recommand products