SKU: 41829086116

SP 1074433004 AFAM Selbstreinigendes Stahlritzel hinten 12323 - 520 passend fuer YAMAHA WR 450 F

$49.56 $55.07
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on 2pierres.com >

Pay in installments of $13.77 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 8 - Oct 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

SP 1074433004 AFAM Selbstreinigendes Stahlritzel hinten 12323 - 520 passend fuer YAMAHA WR 450 FSP 1074433004 AFAM Selbstreinigendes Stahlritzel hinten 12323 520 passend fuer YAMAHA WR 450 F 2007 Stahl Kettenrder von AFAM werden aus C45 Stahl hergestellt und anschlieend gehrtet, um die Haltbarkeit und damit die Laufleistung zu erhhen. Die Fertigungsqualitt und przision seiner Ritzel macht AFAM zur weltweit anerkannten Referenzmarke in Sachen Motorrad Antriebskomponenten. Selbstreinigendes Stahl Kettenrad SLK Hochfestes Offroad Stahl Kettenrad

SP 1074433004 AFAM Selbstreinigendes Stahlritzel hinten 12323 - 520 passend fuer YAMAHA WR 450 F 2007

Stahl-Kettenräder von AFAM werden aus C45- Stahl hergestellt und anschließend gehärtet, um die Haltbarkeit und damit die Laufleistung zu erhöhen. Die Fertigungsqualität und -präzision seiner Ritzel macht AFAM zur weltweit anerkannten Referenzmarke in Sachen Motorrad-Antriebskomponenten.

Selbstreinigendes Stahl-Kettenrad SLK

  • Hochfestes Offroad-Stahl-Kettenrad
  • Maximale Gewichtsreduzierung für Einsätze unter Extrembedingungen
  • Herstellung mit RACING T4 Design der vierten Generation
  • Verschleißfester als Aluminium

- M E R K M A L -

Kettenrad Version: selbstreinigend

Kettenteilung: 520

Kettenrad Zahnanzahl: 50

Kettenrad Typ: 12323

Material: Stahl

passend für:

HONDA NX 250 (MD21) 1988
HONDA NX 250 (MD21) 1989
HONDA NX 250 (MD21) 1990
HONDA NX 250 1991
HONDA NX 250 1992
HONDA NX 250 1993
HONDA XR 250 R (ME01) 1981
HONDA XR 250 R (ME01) 1982
HONDA XR 250 R (ME01) 1983
HONDA XR 250 R (ME06) 1984
HONDA XR 250 R (ME06) 1985
HONDA XR 250 R (ME06) 1986
HONDA XR 250 R (ME06) 1987
HONDA XR 500 R (PE01) 1980
HONDA XR 500 R (PE03) 1983
HONDA XR 500 R (PE03) 1984
HONDA XR 600 R (PE04) 1985
HONDA XR 600 R (PE04) 1986
HONDA XR 600 R (PE04) 1987
HONDA CB 250 RS (MC02) 1982
HONDA XL 250 R (MD03) 1982
HONDA XL 250 R (MD03) 1983
HONDA XL 250 S (L250S) 1979
HONDA XL 250 S (L250S) 1980
HONDA XL 250 S (L250S) 1981
HONDA XL 400 R (PD01) 1982
HONDA XL 400 S (PD01) 1981
HONDA XL 500 R (PD02) 1982
HONDA XL 500 S (PD01) 1980
HONDA XL 600 R (PD03) 1983
HONDA XL 600 R (PD03) 1986
HONDA XL 600 RM (PD04) 1986
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2008
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2009
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2010
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2011
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2012
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2013
YAMAHA WR 250 X (DG20) 2014
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE09) 2002
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE10) 2003
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE13) 2004
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG12) 2002
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG13) 2003
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG17) 2004
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG20) 2005
YAMAHA YZ 426 F (CJ01) 2000
YAMAHA YZ 426 F (CJ01) 2001
YAMAHA YZ 426 F (CJ01) 2002
YAMAHA WR 125 Z 1999
YAMAHA WR 125 Z 2000
YAMAHA WR 125 Z 2001
YAMAHA WR 125 Z 2002
YAMAHA WR 125 Z 2003
YAMAHA WR 426 F (CJ02) 2001
YAMAHA WR 426 F (CJ02) 2002
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ04) 2003
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ04) 2004
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ07) 2005
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ09) 2006
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ12) 2007
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ13) 2008
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ13) 2009
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ13) 2010
YAMAHA WR 450 F (CJ13) 2011
YAMAHA WR 450 F (DJ03) 2012
YAMAHA WR 450 F (DJ03) 2013
YAMAHA WR 450 F (DJ03) 2014
YAMAHA WR 450 F (DJ03) 2015
YAMAHA WR 450 F 2016
YAMAHA WR 450 F 2017
YAMAHA WR 450 F (RE45) 2018
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG34) 2014
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG34) 2015
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG34) 2016
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG39) 2017
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG39) 2018
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG05) 1999
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG08) 2000
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG08) 2001
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2006
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2007
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2008
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2009
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2010
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2011
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2012
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2013
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2014
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2015
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2016
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2017
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2018
YAMAHA YZ 250 X 2016
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2019
YAMAHA YZ 250 X 2017
YAMAHA YZ 250 X 2018
YAMAHA YZ 250 X 2019
YAMAHA WR 450 F (RE45) 2019
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG40) 2019
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2020
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG40) 2020
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2021
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG40) 2021
YAMAHA WR 250 F 2020
YAMAHA WR 250 F 2021
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG26) 2007
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2008
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2009
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2010
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2011
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2012
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2013
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG30) 2014
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG36) 2015
YAMAHA WR 250 F (RE25) 2016
YAMAHA WR 250 F (RE25) 2017
YAMAHA WR 250 F (RE25) 2018
YAMAHA WR 250 F (RE25) 2019
YAMAHA WR 450 F (RE45) 2020
YAMAHA WR 450 F 2021
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG27) 2009
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG33) 2010
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG33) 2011
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG33) 2012
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG33) 2013
YAMAHA YZ 250 X 2020
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2008
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ23) 2019
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ23) 2020
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2007
YAMAHA YZ 450 FX 2020
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE15) 2005
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE08) 2001
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ15) 2010
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2012
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2020
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ10) 2009
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2011
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ21) 2017
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2016
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE05) 2000
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ15) 2011
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2015
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ21) 2016
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ10) 2007
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ22) 2018
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2021
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE03) 1999
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ15) 2012
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ18) 2015
FANTIC XE 125 2021
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ10) 2006
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2017
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ18) 2014
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2010
FANTIC XX 125 2021
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2013
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2009
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2006
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2019
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ15) 2013
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2018
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ23) 2021
YAMAHA YZ 450 F (CJ10) 2008
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2014
YAMAHA WR 450 F ENDURO GP (RE45) 2018
YAMAHA TT-R 125 LW BIG WHEELS E (CE21) 2021
YAMAHA WR 250 F 2022
YAMAHA YZ 250 F 2022
YAMAHA WR 450 F 2022
YAMAHA YZ 450 F 2022
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2022
FANTIC XE 125 2022
FANTIC XX 125 2022
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2022
YAMAHA YZ 125 (CE16) 2023
YAMAHA YZ 250 (CG23) 2023
YAMAHA YZ 250 F 2023
YAMAHA WR 450 F 2023
YAMAHA YZ 450 F 2023
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2023
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG22) 2005
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG16) 2004
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG16) 2003
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG11) 2002
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG11) 2001
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2016
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2015
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2014
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2013
YAMAHA WR 250 F (CG24) 2006
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2012
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2010
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2009
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2008
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG27) 2008
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG27) 2007
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG25) 2006
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG21) 2005
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG18) 2004
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG14) 2003
YAMAHA WR 250 R (DG20) 2011
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG10) 2002
GAS GAS EC 250 F 2013
GAS GAS EC 250 F 2015
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2022
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2021
YAMAHA WR 250 F ENDURO GP (RE25) 2018
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2020
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2019
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2018
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2017
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2016
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2015
GAS GAS EC 250 F 2014
GAS GAS EC 250 F REPLICA CAMI 2014
RIEJU MARATHON 250 2011
RIEJU MARATHON 250 2010
GAS GAS EC 250 F SIX DAYS 2012
GAS GAS EC 250 F 2012
GAS GAS EC 250 F 2011
GAS GAS EC 250 F 2010
GAS GAS EC 300 F 2015
GAS GAS EC 300 F 2014
GAS GAS EC 300 F 2013
RIEJU MARATHON 250 2012
YAMAHA YZ 250 F (CG10) 2001
YAMAHA YZ 250 2024
YAMAHA YZ 450 F 2024
YAMAHA YZ 125 2024
YAMAHA YZ 250 FX 2024
YAMAHA YZ 250 F 2024
YAMAHA TT-R 110 E (CE17) 2023
YAMAHA TT-R 110 E (CE17) 2024
YAMAHA WR 250 F 2023
YAMAHA WR 250 F 2024
YAMAHA WR 450 F 2024
YAMAHA YZ 450 F 2025
HONDA XL 600 L PARIS DAKAR (PD03) 1983
HONDA XL 600 L PARIS DAKAR (PD03) 1984
HONDA XL 600 LM PARIS DAKAR (PD04) 1985
HONDA XL 600 LM PARIS DAKAR (PD04) 1986
HONDA XL 600 LM PARIS DAKAR (PD04) 1987
HONDA XL 600 R (PD03) 1984
HONDA XL 600 R (PD03) 1985
HONDA XL 600 R (PD03) 1987
YAMAHA YZ 125 2025
YAMAHA YZ 250 2025
YAMAHA YZ 125 2026
YAMAHA YZ 250 F 2025
YAMAHA YZ 250 F 2026
YAMAHA YZ 450 F 2026
YAMAHA YZ 250 2026

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 41829086116

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
Terry Anne
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020

recommand products

Toms Drag Elefant L Constantin, 72 cm Classic Line
244.50
Hahn Pat stehend L, 26 cm
134.50
Katze Samantha M, 41 cm
109.50
BERG Rad 400/140-8 Farm, Vorderrad rechts New Holland, weiß
119.00
Foto-/Bilderrahmen Wings S, 19 cm
79.00