Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
B7022-E-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0167275760000 7022ACDGA P4A Gewicht: 2000 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 170,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 28,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 28,00 E 25 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 1. 94 Innenmae: mm 110,00
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0167275760000 7022ACDGA/P4A |
| Gewicht: 2000 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 170,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 28,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 28,00 |
| E 25° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 1.94 |
| Innenmaße: mm 110,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 106000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 73000 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 2.820 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 20.814 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 46,6 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 121 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 280 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 596 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 73.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 106.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 6.600 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 106.000 N |
| E tk max 135,1 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 128,6 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 135,1 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 128,6 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 6.600 N |
| F V H 6.709 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 968 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 20.814 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 2.820 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 135,1 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 2 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 128,6 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 2 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 73.000 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 968 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 6.709 N |
| a 46,6 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 596 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 280 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 121 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 2 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 2 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 2 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 1,925 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 514 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Very good quality comparable to OEM at a much more reasonable price point.
Size: (Pack of 1)
Last December we bought our first new car in 21 years and the first thing I did is stock up on cabin and engine air filters. I've got nothing against dealership OEM parts and pieces but what I do have an issue with is the prices. Luckily, we all have a bit of control over access to OEM quality parts and pieces at significantly more reasonable prices via Amazon. This filter and it's matching cabin filter are excellent in value and take less than 5 minutes to replace. Compare that to paying the hourly rate at your dealer plus the dealership retail price and you'll do what I did and stock up on these two filters. Definitely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2025
★★★★★ 4
It will fit a 2022 Subaru Outback
Size: (Pack of 1)
Higher quality than OEM item fit and arrived on time. This was for a 2023 Subaru Outback
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 15, 2025
★★★★★ 5
High quality
Size: (Pack of 1)
Looks a lot nicer than the one that came with my Subaru Outback (OEM). Performs the same or better.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect fit for my 2018 Civic—easy, affordable, and worth it
Size: 9.5" x 10.9" x 2.1"
I’ve bought this cabin air filter multiple times for my 2018 Honda Civic, and it’s consistently great quality. It fits perfectly and is super easy to install—takes just a few minutes to swap out, and I always do it myself. Way cheaper than going to a shop or dealership. The airflow is smooth, there’s no smell at all, and it keeps the inside of my car feeling clean and fresh. No weird odors, no dust blowing in—just a solid, dependable filter that does its job well. This is the only one I’ll keep buying.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Do it mayne
Size: 9.5" x 10.9" x 2.1"
Good quality and fit but find it funny that the instructions with the air flow are on the side. I assume that would be facing out and was annoyed when I tried to close and it didn’t fit. Probably should have read the directions. Still would recommend
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2026