Pay in installments of $79.39 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 26 - Jul 31
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
C2318 SKFTechnische Basisdaten Auendurchmesser: 190 ueres Breitenma: 64 ueres Breitenma: B: 64 mm Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 73. 5 kN Gewicht: 8910 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 4 000 r min Hersteller: SKF Innenlagerluftfaktor: k2: 0. 101 Kantenabstand: r12: min. 3 mm Referenzdrehzahl: 2 800 r min Schiefstellungsfaktor: k1: 0. 108 Erweiterte technische Daten 64 mm ueres Breitenma A negative value for Ca is theoretical. Anzahl der Reihen 1 ueres Breitenma 64 mm Dynamische
Technische Basisdaten
| Außendurchmesser: 190 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 64 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: B: 64 mm |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 73.5 kN |
| Gewicht: 8910 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 4 000 r/min |
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Innenlagerluftfaktor: k2: 0.101 |
| Kantenabstand: r12: min.3 mm |
| Referenzdrehzahl: 2 800 r/min |
| Schiefstellungsfaktor: k1: 0.108 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 64 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß |
| A negative value for Ca is theoretical. |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß 64 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 610 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 610 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 8.48 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 4 000 r/min |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Referenzdrehzahl 2 800 r/min |
| Statische Tragzahl 695 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 695 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171505 |
| Zulässige axiale Verschiebbarkeit: max.9.6 mm |
| eClass-Code 23-05-09-13 |
| max.2.5 mm Radius der Rundung |
| max.9.6 mm Zulässige axiale Verschiebbarkeit |
| min.104 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
| min.3 mm Kantenabstand |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Quality Under Armour socks
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Black
Nice medium thick sock that is breathable but cushioned. It stays put in the show and doesn’t fall down. Fit is true to size, no show/minimal show
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect Pairs
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Black
Very comfortable, soft & affordable..
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent athletic socks
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Black
Solid athletic socks at a great price. Not too thick, not too thin. Second time I've purchased them. They last longer than most socks I've used in the past too.
Only concern is the sizing. I may be reading the sizing chart wrong, but for my size 13 feet it says XL are the correct sock size. I've ordered Large twice and they're perfect. I would imagine the size Large socks would also fit up to size 14 shoe, but probably need to go with XL if foot is lager than 14.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Great product
Size: Large, Color: (035) Steel / White / Black
Comfortable fit perfect
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Quality No Show Socks That Are Comfortable and Durable
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Black
These Under Armour no show socks are great for everyday training and casual wear. The cotton blend feels comfortable and they stay in place throughout the day. Getting six pairs in a pack is solid value for a quality brand. They hold up well after multiple washes and the no show style works great with most athletic shoes. A reliable go-to sock.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026