SKU: 77471630808

Aluminum Toe Plates Kit

Sale price$89.78 Regular price$99.75
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $24.94 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Aluminum Toe Plates KitNow in stock and shipping! At SLRspeed, we've engineered the most robust and versatile toe plates on the market, designed specifically for the needs of high performance driving enthusiasts and professionals. Whether you're dialing in your alignment for drifting, circuit racing, or daily driving, our super thick 3mm anodized aluminum toe plates offer unparalleled precision, durability, and ease of use. Here's why SLRspeed's toe plates are the best

Now in stock and shipping!

At SLRspeed, we've engineered the most robust and versatile toe plates on the market, designed specifically for the needs of high-performance driving enthusiasts and professionals. Whether you're dialing in your alignment for drifting, circuit racing, or daily driving, our super thick 3mm anodized aluminum toe plates offer unparalleled precision, durability, and ease of use. Here's why SLRspeed's toe plates are the best choice for achieving perfect alignment every time.

Why Toe Alignment Matters:

  • Superior Handling and Stability: Proper toe settings directly affect how your car handles in corners and its stability at high speeds. Fine-tuning your toe alignment with SLRspeed toe plates ensures maximum cornering grip and consistent straight-line performance, giving you an edge in every race.
  • Extend Tire Life: Incorrect toe settings can cause uneven tire wear, leading to premature tire replacement. Our precision plates allow you to achieve exact toe-in or toe-out settings, preventing accelerated wear on your tires and saving you money over time.
  • Optimized Wheel Alignment: Toe is a key factor in achieving a complete wheel alignment. With our laser-engraved measurements and conversion chart, you'll ensure that all four wheels are perfectly aligned, improving overall handling and vehicle control.
  • Balance Between Understeer and Oversteer: Adjust your toe settings to fine-tune your car's handling balance, allowing for personalized performance based on track conditions and driving preferences. SLRspeed toe plates make it easy to adapt your setup for ultimate control.
  • Enhanced Cornering Response: Achieve the quickest steering response and the best cornering performance by adjusting your toe settings with precision. Whether on the drift course or circuit, our plates help you optimize your car’s behavior during turns.

Key Features of SLRspeed Toe Plates:

  • Industry-Leading Durability: Made from super thick 3mm anodized aluminum, our toe plates are the thickest and strongest available, ensuring lasting durability and accuracy with every use. These plates are built to withstand even the harshest racing conditions.
  • Laser-Engraved Precision: Our toe plates feature laser-engraved measurements and a conversion chart for millimeters, inches, and degrees, making adjustments simple and ensuring long-lasting clarity.
  • Unique Multi-Angle Viewing: Unlike standard toe plates, SLRspeed plates allow you to measure and view your toe settings from the front, top, side, back, or even under the car—a feature unique to our design that makes getting precise results easier than ever.
  • SLR Tape Measures Included: Each set comes with our high-quality tape measures, displaying metric measurements for quick and precise toe adjustments. These tapes make measuring easier and more efficient.
  • Kick-Out Stability Design: Our plates feature a kick-out design that ensures they sit flush and stable against the tire, providing consistency and reliability during every measurement.
  • Simple to Use, Alone or with a Team: While other brands may recommend two people for stability, SLRspeed toe plates can be easily used solo thanks to their rigid construction and convenient design.

Why Choose SLRspeed Toe Plates?

  • Efficient Alignment Adjustments: SLRspeed toe plates provide the fastest, easiest way to measure and adjust toe, allowing you to make quick changes whether you're at the track or in the garage.
  • Versatility for Front and Rear Use: Whether you’re adjusting front or rear alignment settings, our plates are designed for both applications, ensuring comprehensive alignment accuracy for all vehicles.
  • Post-Adjustment Confidence: After making any camber or caster adjustments, use our toe plates to verify your toe settings and ensure your car is aligned for optimal performance.
  • Trusted by Professionals: Designed and tested by top racing teams and car enthusiasts, SLRspeed toe plates are a must-have tool for anyone serious about precise alignment and performance.

Dimensions and Compatibility

With generous dimensions and coverage, our toe plates offer ample room for measuring toe on any type of vehicle, from race cars to trucks and ATVs. The plates are engineered for compatibility with a wide range of setups, making them the perfect alignment tool for any car, whether on the street or the track.

These super thick and durable 3mm aluminum anodized toe plates allow you to adjust your toe-in or toe-out from either outside or from under your car where you can turn your tape measure sideways. On these toe plates you also have all degrees measurements laser etched and you can convert between different measurements with ease, setting up your wheel alignment hasn't been easier.

- Thickest toe plates in the industry!
- Laser engraved to withstand chemicals and weather like a champ!
- Strong enough to last a lifetime!

Regardless of your car, from E30, E36, E46, E90 to Corvette C6 / C5, Porsche, Mercedes, Mustang, RX7, etc. - these toe plates will help get your toe measurement and settings setup properly.

*Sold as a pair of toe alignment plates and hardware with the option of a pair of metric tape measures.

- MANUFACTURED AND ASSEMBLED IN USA 🇺🇸 -

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 77471630808

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
New York, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014
K
Verified Purchase
KC
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource for defending why Christianity is not rooted in mythology
Format: Paperback
I bought this book as required reading for an introductory Old Testament class I was taking in seminary. Sad to say, the textbook mostly collects dust. To this day, I use Oswalt's book for reference and continue to recommend the reading of it to others. I do not believe one can fully defend the Christian faith without first knowing how firmly convinced some scholars and historians are that Christianity is rooted in mythology. I will not lie. If you read about some of these myths in a silo, you may find yourself leaning toward such false beliefs. When you take a step back and consider the time in history in which the Old Testament was written, the picture becomes more clear. In the introduction to the Old Testament class, we also read Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament by John H. Walton. Again, the text book is mostly collecting dust, I also repeatedly use this one as a reference. I would strongly recommend reading both books. The second is more academic in style than the first, but it helps lend further context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2015
P
Verified Purchase
P. Hayes
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
An inspiring take on the story of the Bible and reality.
Format: Kindle
This was an absolute pleasure to read. Oswalt utilizes his knowledge of ancient near east culture and religion to thorough debunk any effort to one might make to pretend that the Bible is of a similar mythology.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2025

recommand products