SKU: 95488241688

AEXZR® Self-Warming Mat 🌡️ No Electricity Needed

Sale price$31.49 Regular price$34.99
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $8.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

AEXZR® Self-Warming Mat 🌡️ No Electricity NeededDon't Just "Hope" They'll Stay Warm. Make It Happen. From the freezing tile floor to the drafty corner by the door. Just place it down, and watch them curl up. No plugs, no timers, no worrying if you left it on. Why Do You Need This? Let's be honestwinter is tough on pets, and most "solutions" don't actually solve anything. Electric heating pads are scary: What if they chew the cord? What if it overheats while you're at work? Regular blankets don't

Don't Just "Hope" They'll Stay Warm. Make It Happen.

From the freezing tile floor to the drafty corner by the door. Just place it down, and watch them curl up. No plugs, no timers, no worrying if you left it on.

 

Why Do You Need This?

Let's be honest—winter is tough on pets, and most "solutions" don't actually solve anything.

❌ Electric heating pads are scary: What if they chew the cord? What if it overheats while you're at work?

❌ Regular blankets don't cut it: They just sit on top of the cold—your pet still feels the chill from below.

❌ Older pets suffer silently: Arthritis gets worse in the cold, but you can't run the heater 24/7.

❌ Cats refuse noisy mats: That crinkly aluminum sound? Instant no from your cat.

❌ Cleaning is a nightmare: Most thermal mats can't be washed, so they get gross fast.

 

How AEXZR® Changes Your Pet's Winter

We didn't just add fluff. We engineered a heat management system.

1. Body Heat Reflection, Not Electricity

The thermal reflective layer acts like a mirror for infrared heat—your pet's own warmth bounces back instead of escaping into the floor.

👉 This means: You can leave it out 24/7 with zero safety concerns. No cords to chew. No fire risk. No electric bill spike.

2. 5-Layer Insulation Blocks Cold from Below

Think of it as a sleeping bag for your pet—heat stays in, cold stays out.

👉 This means: Even on freezing tile or concrete, your senior dog's joints stay cushioned and warm. No more shivering on the porch or by the door.

3. Silent Design = Cats Actually Use It

We eliminated the "crinkle" with a noise-dampening foam layer between the reflective film and the fabric.

👉 This means: Your skittish cat won't run away. In fact, 89% of cats accept it within 24 hours (based on user feedback).

4. Machine Washable & Quick-Dry

Dirty paws? Accidents? Just cold-water wash and air dry.

👉 This means: No more throwing away mats because they smell. This one lasts through 50+ washes without losing its warming power.

 

Why Does It Work?

This isn't just a blanket. It's thermal engineering for pets.

🔸 Layer 1: Thermal Reflective Film

What it is: Aluminum-coated polyester that reflects up to 70% of radiated body heat.

What it means for you: Your pet's warmth doesn't vanish into the floor—it wraps back around them like a hug. Body temperature stays 3-5°C warmer than on a regular mat.

🔸 Layer 2: Noise-Dampening Foam

What it is: EVA foam interlayer that absorbs friction sound.

What it means for you: No more "crinkle-crinkle" that makes cats bolt. This is library-quiet (<30 decibels).

🔸 Layer 3: Insulating Loft Fill

What it is: Polyester fiber batting that traps air pockets.

What it means for you: Even if your floor is 10°C, the mat surface stays warm. It's like the difference between sleeping on concrete vs. a sleeping bag.

🔸 Layer 4: Soft Fleece Top

What it is: Short-pile sherpa fleece that's breathable and moisture-wicking.

What it means for you: Feels like your favorite hoodie. Pets instinctively curl up on it—no training required.

🔸 Layer 5: Non-Slip Grip Base

What it is: Silicone dot backing that grips hardwood, tile, and carpet.

What it means for you: Stays put when your dog circles before lying down. Won't slide on stairs or in the car.

 

🛡️ The "No-Nasty" List:

✅ BPA-Free – Safe even if your pet licks it

✅ No Electrical Components – Zero fire or shock risk

✅ Latex-Free – Hypoallergenic for sensitive pets

✅ Non-Toxic Dyes – Won't irritate skin or paws

✅ Washable 50+ Times – Performance doesn't degrade

 

What People Are Saying

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"My 14-year-old Lab finally stopped shivering at night."

"We have hardwood floors and no central heating. She used to refuse to sleep anywhere but our bed. Now she has her own warm spot by the fireplace (which we don't even light anymore). The mat works."

— Jennifer K., Vermont | 1 Senior Dog

 

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"The only mat my cat didn't reject."

"I've bought 4 different 'self-warming' mats. All of them made that awful crinkling sound. My cat would sniff them and walk away. This one? She was asleep on it within an hour. I bought 3 more."

— David L., Ontario | 3 Cats

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"Perfect for my car—my dog actually enjoys rides now."

"I drive for work and bring my Beagle along. The backseat used to be freezing. Now I keep this mat back there, and he curls up instead of shivering the whole trip. Game changer."

— Marcus T., Minnesota | 1 Beagle

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Will this actually keep my pet warm without electricity?

A: Yes—but it works differently than a heating pad. It doesn't generate heat; it reflects and traps your pet's own body heat. Think of it like a space blanket for astronauts. As long as your pet has normal body temperature, the mat will keep them 3-5°C warmer than a regular bed.

Q2: My cat is terrified of crinkly sounds. Is this silent?

A: That's exactly why we added the EVA foam dampening layer. Traditional reflective mats use bare aluminum foil, which crinkles. Ours is sandwiched between fabric and foam—it's as quiet as a regular blanket.

Q3: Can I wash this in the machine?

A: Yes! Use cold water on a gentle cycle. Air dry or tumble dry on LOW. The reflective layer is sealed inside, so it won't peel or flake. We've tested it through 50+ washes with no performance loss.

Q4: What size should I get?

A: Measure your pet when they're lying down in their favorite "curled up" position, then add 4-6 inches on each side.

  • S (20"×15") – Cats, toy breeds, crate liners
  • M (28"×22") – Small dogs (Beagle, Corgi), cat beds
  • L (35"×23") – Medium dogs (Bulldog, Cocker Spaniel)
  • XL (42"×28") – Large dogs (Lab, Golden Retriever)

Q5: Will this work on carpet, or only hard floors?

A: It works on both! The thermal reflection works regardless of surface. On carpet, it adds extra insulation. On tile/hardwood, it blocks the cold from below. The non-slip base keeps it in place on any surface.

Q6: Is it safe for puppies and senior pets?

A: Absolutely. There are no electrical parts, no small pieces to chew, and no toxic materials. Senior pets with arthritis especially benefit—the warmth soothes joints without the risk of overheating from electric pads.

 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 95488241688

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 6 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014
K
Verified Purchase
KC
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent resource for defending why Christianity is not rooted in mythology
Format: Paperback
I bought this book as required reading for an introductory Old Testament class I was taking in seminary. Sad to say, the textbook mostly collects dust. To this day, I use Oswalt's book for reference and continue to recommend the reading of it to others. I do not believe one can fully defend the Christian faith without first knowing how firmly convinced some scholars and historians are that Christianity is rooted in mythology. I will not lie. If you read about some of these myths in a silo, you may find yourself leaning toward such false beliefs. When you take a step back and consider the time in history in which the Old Testament was written, the picture becomes more clear. In the introduction to the Old Testament class, we also read Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament by John H. Walton. Again, the text book is mostly collecting dust, I also repeatedly use this one as a reference. I would strongly recommend reading both books. The second is more academic in style than the first, but it helps lend further context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2015
P
Verified Purchase
P. Hayes
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
An inspiring take on the story of the Bible and reality.
Format: Kindle
This was an absolute pleasure to read. Oswalt utilizes his knowledge of ancient near east culture and religion to thorough debunk any effort to one might make to pretend that the Bible is of a similar mythology.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2025

recommand products