Pay in installments of $10.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 17 - Aug 22
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
BLITZ OIL SENSOR ATTACHMENT For MITSUBISHI LANCER EVO VII CT9A 4G63 19236Brand BLITZ Product Name OIL SENSOR ATTACHMENT Product Number 19236 Compatible Car MITSUBISHI LANCER EVO VII CT9A Compatible Engine 4G63 Product Description Model Year: 01 02 03 01 Chassis Model: CT9A center bolt: M20 P1. 5 O Ring Size: _65 Product: Type D Product Name: oIL sENSOR aTTACHMENT Description: TEMP sensor, attachment to be used when attaching the PRESS sensor in a sandwich like to the oil filter. center bolts, 3 4 16 and included both the
| Brand | BLITZ |
| Product Name | OIL SENSOR ATTACHMENT |
| Product Number | 19236 |
| Compatible Car | MITSUBISHI LANCER EVO VII CT9A |
| Compatible Engine | 4G63 |
| Product Description | Model Year: 01 / 02-03 / 01 Chassis Model: CT9A center bolt: M20-P1.5 O-Ring Size: Ï_65 Product: Type D Product Name: oIL sENSOR aTTACHMENT Description: TEMP sensor, attachment to be used when attaching the PRESS sensor in a sandwich-like to the oil filter. center bolts, 3 / 4-16 and included both the M20-P1.5 (Type H is, M20-P1.5 only). O-ring is Ï_65, Ï_70 size support both (Type H is, Fai65 size only). sensor mounting portion, setting the hole of 1 / 8PT. There are three places, you can change the mounting position according to the model. part of TOYOTA 86 and SUBARU system models, set the Type H which gave the height on the attachment to be mounted a sensor in the oil filter unit, such as HONDA S660. 1 / 8PT sinking two bundled plug. Engraved "BLITZ" logo. |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Easy to use.
Size: 2+6+1+12 Pack
They work very well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Not so good
Size: 2+6+1+12 Pack
These placement filters are not as good as the original. They seem to hold onto the debris & don't release it into the reservoir. I clean the filter & reservoir after each use & always find the filter full & the reservoir nearly empty.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Well priced
Size: 1+6+6 Pack
Very economically priced set of replacement parts for Eufy RoboVac 11S Max
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect fit
Size: 2+6+1+12 Pack
This is the second time I have ordered replacement parts for my Eufy robot vac. They fit perfectly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good value replacement parts package
Size: 2+6+1+12 Pack
Purchasing the Replacement Parts for my Eufy RoboVac 11S Max has proven to be an excellent value for the cost. The kit, which includes brushes and a filter, has significantly extended the life and maintained the efficiency of my vacuum. It's reassuring to know that I can keep my RoboVac performing at its best without the need for costly professional services or a premature replacement of the unit itself. The ease of replacing the parts meant that my vacuum was back to its optimal cleaning performance in no time. For anyone looking to maintain their Eufy RoboVac 11S Max in top condition, these replacement parts are a wise and economical choice.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2024