SKU: 5032791034

JBA Exhaust Headers for Ford Mustang V8 289 CID for 1964-1973 - 6612SJS

Sale price$512.44 Regular price$569.38
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $142.34 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 3 - Oct 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

JBA Exhaust Headers for Ford Mustang V8 289 CID for 1964-1973 - 6612SJSOverview: 65 73 Mustang Long Tube 260 351 Slvr Ctd JBA long tube headers are the number one choice for maximum performance gains and high RPM efficiency. Available in 409 or 304 Series Stainless Steel. These long tube designs are dyno and race proven to deliver the greatest possible increase in horsepower and torque throughout the RPM range. All JBA long tube headers feature large mandrel bent stainless steel primary tubes, oversized exhaust ports,

Overview:

65-73 Mustang Long Tube 260-351 Slvr Ctd

JBA long tube headers are the number one choice for maximum performance gains and high RPM efficiency. Available in 409 or 304 Series Stainless Steel. These long tube designs are dyno and race proven to deliver the greatest possible increase in horsepower and torque throughout the RPM range. All JBA long tube headers feature large mandrel-bent stainless steel primary tubes, oversized exhaust ports, extra thick 3/8 one-piece flanges, and proprietary JBA Firecone® merged collectors for smooth flow. Each system is designed to give the maximum amount of ground clearance possible, so lowered cars do not drag the collectors.

Features:

  • 3/8" thick CNC laser-cut flanges
  • Patented JBA Firecone® collector
  • O2 sensor provisions
  • Large diameter mandrel-bent steel tubes
  • Oversized exhaust ports
  • Specs:

  • Brand: JBA Performance
  • California Proposition 65: WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including chromium, which is know to the State of California to cause cancer or birth defects of other reproductive harm. For more information, visit www.p65warnings.ca.gov
  • Catalytic Converter(s) Included: No
  • Collector Diameter: 2.5
  • Collector Port Diameter: 2.5
  • Collector Reducers Included: Yes
  • Color: Grey
  • Design: Full-length
  • Finish: Metallic Ceramic Coated
  • Flange Thickness: 46089
  • Gasket Or Seal Included: Yes
  • Gaskets Included: Yes
  • Grade Type: Performance
  • Header Material: 409 Stainless Steel
  • Header Style: Full-length
  • Mounting Hardware Included: Yes
  • Oxygen Sensor Port: No
  • Primary Tube Outside Diameter: 1.75
  • Primary Tubing Diameter: 1.75
  • Sheen Level: Semi-Gloss
  • Tube Wall Thickness: 0.059
  • Part Number: 6612SJS
  • Applications:

    • 1964-1968 Ford Mustang 289 CID
    • 1964-1965 Ford Mustang 260 CID
    • 1968-1973 Ford Mustang 302 CID
    • 1969-1973 Ford Mustang 351 CID
  • Emissions:

    • This product is Legal for use on Pre-Pollution Controlled Vehicles. It is legal for use on all vehicles produced Before Emissions Control Regulations were imposed. These are considered Uncontrolled Vehicles and are defined as follows
      • 1965 and Older US Manufactured California Certified Vehicles
      • 1967 and Older US Manufactured Federally Certified Vehicles
      • 1967 and Older Foreign Manufactured Vehicles
    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 5032791034

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.4 ★★★★★
    Based on 19 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    M
    Verified Purchase
    Maya Dalton
    Lake Worth, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Just like the other but better!
    Size: 1.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
    I love the regular mineral face sunscreen so wanted to try the new liquid face sunscreen! It seems to be the same formula but way easier to apply. Applies more like a moisturizer and easy to run in! It still has the same protection and reliability!! Sunbum will always be a favorite!
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on August 23, 2025
    A
    Verified Purchase
    A
    Omaha, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    A Sensitive Skin Must
    Size: 1.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
    Very smooth and easy to rub in. No white cast. Great for sensitive skin. Daughter has eczema and I have rosacea, we both use this sunscreen without any issues.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2026
    T
    Verified Purchase
    that Kelly girl
    Port Orchard, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Does well on my sensitive skin
    Size: 1.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
    This is a good sunscreen, doesn't bother my sensitive skin or cause a roseacea flare up. It is a bit too dewy for my taste to wear just by itself, but does just fine when I use it under my makeup. If you like the "glass skin" look, it would be a good option.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on October 26, 2025
    M
    Verified Purchase
    Mile High Shark
    Louisville, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    This really works!
    Style: SPF 50, Size: 1 Count (Pack of 1)
    A week on the beach and no burns! It is a little hard to get rubbed in and I probably had a little bit of a white cast on my skin. So worth it though for the protection of me and the reefs.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on June 28, 2023
    E
    Verified Purchase
    emily
    Waukegan, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Great product
    Style: SPF 50, Size: 1 Count (Pack of 1)
    Great product - does leave a white cast but worth it for the healthier option
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on August 22, 2025

    recommand products