Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 11 - Jul 16
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1967-1969 Firebird Pro+ Brake System Rear 4302413MGFits 1967 69 GM F Body Cars w OE Small Pattern 10 12 Bolt Bearing on Axle (BOA) Housing Ends, Also Fits Hybrid 10 12 Bolt Non Flush Mount 3. 150" Bearing Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece
Fits 1967-69 GM F-Body Cars w/OE Small Pattern 10/12 Bolt Bearing on Axle (BOA) Housing Ends, Also Fits Hybrid 10/12 Bolt Non-Flush Mount 3.150" Bearing
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | GM F-Body 67-69 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Rear |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Monster Green |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type | Fixed |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter | 14.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/Hybrid 10/12 Bolt Non-Flush Mount 3.150" Bearing |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE Small Pattern 10/12 Bolt Bearing on Axle (BOA) Housing Ends |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Park Brake | Yes |
| Includes Park Brake Cables | Yes |
| Lug Count | 5 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 18IN |
| Product Line | 14 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 14 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 - Short Label | WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.150IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | For stock bearing on axle rear end |
| Template | Q110P |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Rear |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 5x4.75 |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1967-1969 | Pontiac | Firebird |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 2191 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Fabric way to heavy.
Fit Type: Regular, Size: Medium, Color: White
Cute, but material is WAY to heavy, like the heaviest duty denim I've ever seen. Wanted this to be a cute coverup. If you're needing something while breaking broncos or riding your motorcycle would probably be great. I kept it for a while because it was good quality and well made, but it ended up in the donation pile as I'd never wear this.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 10, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Awesome jacket
Fit Type: Regular, Size: Medium, Color: Stone Dark Wash
Love it so not too long or too short but just right and the color is out of sight and fits awesome
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Old school denim — not stretchy
Fit Type: Regular, Size: X-Small, Color: Authentic Medium Wash
Fabric used is old school denim — not the thin, stretchy stuff that pretty much everything called “denim” is today. It is 99% cotton (20% of which is recycled cotton) and 1% elastane, but I can’t feel any stretch in the fabric. It is a substantial, non-stretchy denim that gives the jacket really good structure. It has a higher end fit and look than the price would suggest.
I wanted a more fitted denim jacket so ordered an XS even though according to the size chart I need a small. (I have a 34.5” bust, 28” waist at 118 pounds 5’4”.) It still buttons over a t shirt or lightweight sweater with freedom for movement/without being tight, but if I wanted a roomy fit or the ability to wear a heavier sweater or sweatshirt underneath and still be able to comfortably button it I would have needed a small. The shoulders are cut broad — I have very broad shoulders and the XS surprisingly fits my shoulders well. This jacket may not be the greatest fit for you if you have very narrow shoulders, unless you are going for an oversized look.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
made well
Fit Type: Regular, Size: Large, Color: Iced Light Wash
I couldn't get this in my size (medium) so I ordered large. it's a little large in the shoulders, but it still looks good. it is a well made, substantial jacket. I love it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Lovely fabric
Size: X-Large, Color: Black Ivory Geometric
Very nice dress that can be dressy or casual
Substantial fabric that’s not see through and doesn’t wrinkle
Great value
Fit is flattering
I know it good when my husband notices and says it’s nice!
Update … I liked the dress so much I ordered 2 more in different colors
Only caveat is the pink floral one is actually red
The background is definitely not pink
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026