Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Catalytic Converter for Standard Grade Federal / EPA Compliant Universal Catalytic Converter MagnaFlow 94026Overview: MagnaFlow Standard Grade Federal EPA Compliant Universal Catalytic Converter 94026 helps keep the check engine light off. Get the right fit for a wide array of vehicles thanks to the adaptable Universal design (cutting and welding is required). With highly corrosion resistant, stainless steel construction, you can have confidence in the quality of this catalytic converter. This direct fit catalytic converter is designed to fit the 1982 1991
Overview:
MagnaFlow Standard Grade Federal/EPA Compliant Universal Catalytic Converter 94026 helps keep the check engine light off. Get the right fit for a wide array of vehicles thanks to the adaptable Universal design (cutting and welding is required). With highly corrosion resistant, stainless steel construction, you can have confidence in the quality of this catalytic converter.
This direct-fit catalytic converter is designed to fit the 1982-1991 Dodge D150, 1984-1987 Buick Regal, and additional vehicles.
Note : Not For Sale in California
Interchange:
| Brand | Interchange Part Number |
|---|
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel | Engine Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 - 1987 | Buick | Regal | 3.8L/V6 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | W150 | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | W150 | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | W150 | 3.9L/V6 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | W250 | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | W250 | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | W350 | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1984 - 1985 | Ford | Bronco II | 2.8L/V6 | |
| 1983 - 1985 | Ford | Ranger | 2.8L/V6 | |
| 1986 - 1987 | Dodge | W100 | 3.7L/L6 | |
| 1989 | Dodge | W100 | 3.9L/V6 | |
| 1989 | Dodge | W100 | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1982 - 1987 | Dodge | W150 | 3.7L/L6 | |
| 1982 - 1987 | Dodge | D150 | 3.7L/L6 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | D150 | 3.9L/V6 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | D150 | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | D150 | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1981 - 1987 | Dodge | D250 | 3.7L/L6 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | D250 | 3.9L/V6 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | D250 | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | D250 | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1988 - 1991 | Dodge | D350 | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | Dakota | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | Ramcharger | 5.2L/V8 | |
| 1989 - 1991 | Dodge | Ramcharger | 5.9L/V8 | |
| 1986 - 1987 | Cadillac | Seville | 4.1L/V8 | |
| 1986 - 1987 | Dodge | D100 | 3.7L/L6 | |
| 1988 - 1989 | Dodge | D100 | 3.9L/V6 | |
| 1988 - 1989 | Dodge | D100 | 5.2L/V8 |
Specs:
| Body Material | Stainless Steel |
|---|---|
| Heat Shield Material | Aluminized Steel |
| Material | Stainless Steel |
| Series | Standard Grade |
| Inlet Orientation | Straight |
| Outlet Orientation | Straight |
| Sensor Port Count | 0 |
| Subtitle | Federal / EPA Compliant |
| Title | Standard Grade Universal |
| Overall Length (In.) | 16 |
| Outlet Quantity | 1 |
| Type | Universal |
| Inlet Quantity | 1 |
| Heat Shield Attached | Yes |
| Oxygen Sensor Location | None |
| Body Width (In.) | 5.5 |
| Body Shape | Oval |
| Body Length (In.) | 12 |
| Body Height (In.) | 3.75 |
| Air Tube Count | 2 |
| Air Tube Adaptable | Yes |
| Outlet Attachment | Weld-On |
| Outlet Diameter | 2.5 |
| Inlet Attachment | Weld-On |
| Inlet Diameter | 2.5 |
| Finish | Stainless Steel |
| Body Type | Clam Shell |
| Substrate Material | Ceramic |
| Heat Shield Included | Yes |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1016 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Eaten by my Thighs
Color: 04-multicolour (4-pack), Size: X-Large
I wanted to love them. Sadly they have let me down.
Pros: natural breathable fabric , super soft and comfortable, cotton panty gussets for feminine health and panty liners will stick!! Yay:). And the colors! They are great!
But here’s the Con. And it’s the con of all cons.
THEY RIDE UP!! Eaten by my thighs. I’m 5’6” and in the general area of 175. I fluctuate depending on how many times I visit the bakery! :) I don’t have a thigh gap but it is not a super tight thigh squeeze. I seldom have thigh climb but these do. I tried two different sizes to see if that made a difference. Nope.
I was miserable at a recent theme park in these. I was wearing long heavy dresses and it was quite awkward to yank these legs down non stop.
They feel amazing and they have all the requirements
1. Soft
2. Comfortable and stretches with you
3. Breathable with nice thin fabric. Not bulky
4. Natural fibers
5. Great colors
If you are a person that is not blessed with Thunder Thighs, please order these. They are great! I wear them at home and to locations that I will not be doing a lot of walking at. I have washed them so many times and they look like new still.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 4, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Best Boxer Briefs for Women!
Color: 09-multicolour (4-pack), Size: Large
I rarely give 5⭐️’s but these deserve it! Hands down, the most comfortable material, stitching, waistband, moisture wicking and overall comfort. They sit right beneath my bellybutton, they wash and dry well and they’re sturdy. I have tried 3 styles and these are the best.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable and cool. Does not ride up.
Color: 01-multicolour (4-pack), Size: Medium
Extremely comfortable. Stays cool. Ample coverage. Quality material. They do not creep up. I ordered a medium which I generally take a size small. I have reordered and will reorder again to add more colors to my collection.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great Value for Cool Thigh Protection
Color: 02-multicolour (4-pack), Size: XX-Large
For the price, I'm not sure there are better women's boxer shortlettes anywhere. I've tried more expensive brands, and for quality and cooling, these are right up there. I have other bamboo viscose undies that still get gross when I get sweaty in the summer, but these, with the large mesh panel, really help wick away a lot of that moisture, keeping you feeling dryer and cooler. I find that the leg openings are comfortable and don't roll up! and the waist band doesn't dig, nor does it roll down. These do not provide any compression, and I wasn't looking for any. I just wanted some cooling, thigh protecting women's boxers that wouldn't break the bank. These are them! Bonus- I've washed them and put them in the dryer (following their instructions), and they haven't shrunk; they look about the same and are nice and soft.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Great for the entire family but expensive
So far so good. The brand of boxers we had been buying changed their style and construction so we needed to find an alternative. These have held up well so far to multiple weeks of frequent washing and wearing from the entire family. We did size up from the usual 6/M we normally buy and ordered large to prevent the legs from rolling up which worked out great. Our daughter likes the length and how soft the fabric is for wearing under skirts and gym shorts and liners stay put without moving or leaking as another reviewer mentioned. Our son says they are comfortable and fit well being just supportive enough without being constrictive. We all agree that there seems to be not enough fabric in the back as they tend to be much tighter across the backside than the front and that also causes the waist band to ride lower in the back than the front. These have better seam placement than some brands we tried with no seam across the lady bits and no seam down the middle of the back side so they are more much comfortable but the cost is also much higher and that is why we're only giving it 4 stars. These will stay in the rotation until we find something cheaper that both us and the kids like.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026