Pay in installments of $140.15 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Pacemaker | Short Tri-Y Performance Headers | VE Commodore & WM Statesman 6.0L 6.2L | PH5377 L/RPacemaker Short Tri Y Performance Headers VE Commodore & WM Statesman V8 PH5377 L R Improve the exhaust flow and performance of your Gen IV powered Holden with the Pacemaker PH5377 Short Tri Y headers. Precision engineered for the VE Commodore and WM Statesman Caprice series, these headers are an ideal upgrade for owners of 6. 0L (L98 L76 L77), LS2, and 6. 2L LS3 V8 engines. The Tri Y design is specifically tuned to broaden the power band, delivering
Pacemaker Short Tri-Y Performance Headers - VE Commodore & WM Statesman V8 - PH5377 L/R
Improve the exhaust flow and performance of your Gen IV powered Holden with the Pacemaker PH5377 Short Tri-Y headers. Precision-engineered for the VE Commodore and WM Statesman/Caprice series, these headers are an ideal upgrade for owners of 6.0L (L98/L76/L77), LS2, and 6.2L LS3 V8 engines. The Tri-Y design is specifically tuned to broaden the power band, delivering increased low-to-mid range torque for better acceleration and towing capability. These "short" style headers are designed for high efficiency while maintaining excellent ground clearance, providing a significant performance gain over the restrictive factory manifolds.
Features:
This product offers the following performance features:
- Short Tri-Y Design: Engineered to provide a perfect balance of torque and horsepower gains throughout the rev range.
- Quality Pipe Sizing: Features 1¾" (44mm) primary pipes and 2" (51mm) secondary pipes for superior scavenging.
- Durable Outlet: Finished with a 2½" (63mm) outlet to ensure smooth transition into the exhaust system.
- Full Accessory Clearance: Fully compatible with both Power Steering and Air Conditioning systems.
- Broad V8 Compatibility: Suits Gen IV 6.0L, 6.0L LS2, and 6.2L LS3 engine variants.
Product Specifications for PH5377 L/R
| Feature | Value | Feature | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part # | PH 5377 | Gasket | DSF 138 |
| Primary Pipe | 1¾" (44mm) | Secondary Pipe | 2" (51mm) |
| Oxy Sensor | Yes | Outlet | 2½" (63mm) |
| P/Steering | Yes | Fitting Time | 2 Hrs |
Important Notes:
- Installation Requirement: These headers require welding to the OEM factory catalytic converters in their original position.
- Transmission: Compatible with both Manual and Automatic models.
Important Information
- The image shown may not reflect the actual product
- Shipping times may vary depending on destination and stock availability
Vehicle Applications:
| Make | Model | From | To | Body | Series | Engine | Variant | Drivetrain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holden | Commodore / SS / HSV | 2006 | 2013 | Sedan / Ute / Wagon | VE | 6.0L / 6.2L V8 | Manual & Automatic | RWD |
| Holden | Statesman / Caprice | 2006 | 2013 | LWB Sedan | WM | 6.0L / 6.2L V8 | Manual & Automatic | RWD |
Warranty Information
| Product | Warranty Period |
|---|---|
| Pacemaker Headers | Two (2) years. |
| Pacemaker King Brown 4x4 Exhaust systems | Five (5) years. |
| Pacemaker Sports exhaust systems | Five (5) years. |
| Fabrication products and accessories | One (1) year. |
Payment & Security:
Your payment information is processed securely. We do not store credit card details nor have access to your credit card information.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
The BEST sunscreen I've found
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This is my MUST HAVE sunscreen. I've had almost every type of skin cancer (thankfully, caught early), so I NEED good sun protection, especially on my face. I have very fair skin. This product leaves a bit of a white cast, but after a short period of time, that white case is absorbed. The white cast of a mineral sunscreen might look chalky on a person with darker skin. The BEST thing about this sunscreen is I can put it on my eyelids and under my eyes, it doesn't irritate my eyes AT ALL. The other well-known sunscreen I used for a long time really made my eyes sting if a bit got into them. This is my favorite sunscreen of all time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Solid mineral SPF with light coverage effect
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I’m used to La Roche-Posay’s chemical sunscreens, so this was my first time trying their mineral version. The texture is actually quite nice for a mineral formula. It spreads evenly and doesn’t feel gritty or chalky. That said, it does take a bit longer to fully absorb compared to chemical SPFs.
I’m already very pale, and I still notice a slight white cast. It’s not extreme, but it’s there. To be fair, most mineral sunscreens tend to do this, especially those using zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.
Interestingly, on my skin it almost behaves like a very light tinted sunscreen. It slightly blurs and softens the appearance of minor blemishes and redness, which I appreciate on minimal-makeup days.
It provides broad-spectrum SPF 50 protection and feels gentle on sensitive skin. I haven’t experienced irritation, pilling, or breakouts. It layers reasonably well over moisturizer but benefits from being applied in thin, well-blended layers, which adds some time to my morning routine so it's a little inconvenient.
Overall, it’s a solid mineral option with good protection. Just expect a bit more blending time and a subtle cast.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great for pregnancy (or regular use)
Style: SPF 50, Size: 4.05 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I searched far and wide for a safe mineral-based sunscreen for pregnancy. I settled on this one and I was not disappointed. It saved my skin from a lot of sunburn this summer!
As other reviewers mentioned, it is harder to rub into the skin and can leave a whiteish tint, but that’s a small price to pay for a pregnancy-safe option.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 22, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Terrible, look like a ghost
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I love La Roche-Posay but unfortunately, I finally came across the first product I truly hate from them. This product is a complete white mask on your face and does not settle in at all. You’ll be walking around looking like a ghost all day and it gave me a mild irritation to my eyes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Leaves white cast, works okay under makeup.
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
First time using this sunscreen. I have very sensitive skin and thought since my skin tolerates their cleansers and moisturizers surely it should tolerate the sunscreen. So far so good. It’s very calming on my skin (maybe because of the zinc), but it leaves a noticeable white cast especially if you have dark skin. I wear mine under makeup and have a separate sunscreen from another brand on days where I don’t want to wear makeup. The white cast actually acts as a blank base and helps my foundation to lay well. A tip I learned from makeup artists years ago. Sunscreens that leave a white cast cancels out your natural color and acts as a corrector, concealer and foundation to lay better and look more like skin. Think of it like painting on a blank canvas. The texture is not lotion like and is actually quite thick. make sure to moisturize well before apply this sunscreen. I’ll write an update if I notice any negative issues, but so far I’m content with it because of the purpose I'm using it for.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2023