Pay in installments of $27.75 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 6 - Sep 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
能量巴士：10條法則全方位啟動人生、工作和團隊的正能量: : 300 10 10 Jon Gordon 3017The Coffee BeanThe SeedThe Carpenter300 The Today ShowCNNCNBCSnapchatCampbells SoupNorthwestern MutualPublix AI
作者: 強・高登 ｜ 譯者: 李芳齡
困難和逆境是人生常態
每一天，你都可以重新為自己作出有益的選擇，送自己一份最棒的禮物
《華爾街日報》暢銷書 ★ 全球銷售逾300萬冊
搭乘這輛「能量巴士」，啟動正向新思維，
無論天晴或暴雨，你都能用心享受你的人生之旅
週一早晨，喬治走出家門，準備開車上班，卻發現輪胎爆胎了。倒楣嗎？在他身陷的眾多問題與麻煩當中，這算是最微不足道的了。他的家庭生活亂糟糟，他的工作團隊混亂無序、動力低落，他們公司即將推出一項重大產品上市，他和他的團隊將在兩週後進行產品發表簡報。他同時被老闆和太太發出最後通牒，若不能設法振作起來，他的工作、婚姻和家庭可能皆不保。
車子爆胎了，車廂裡面的備胎也是爆胎。眼下來不及、也沒時間處理了，喬治被迫走路去搭巴士上班，豈料搭上了一班「神奇」巴士。他遇到一位很獨特的巴士司機，以及一群有趣的人物，在接下來的兩星期裡，他們和喬治分享駕馭人生的10條法則，幫助他改變心態和思維，順利扭轉工作與生活，拯救了他的飯碗、婚姻和家庭。
▍生活順利的時候，你不會思考原因，很容易視為理所當然。
遭遇考驗其實是人生常態，你該做的不是唉聲嘆氣、怨天尤人。
每一件事情發生都有原因，每一個問題都帶著一份禮物給你。
你可以選擇當作一場災難，或是當作一份禮物，
這個選擇將決定你的人生是個成功的故事，或是一齣大型的肥皂劇。
每個人的人生中必然遭遇困難和挑戰，每一個人、組織、公司、團隊都必須克服負面、消極、逆境，以定義自己，創造成功。任何人或組織都會遭遇考驗，為了成功應付考驗，必不可缺的是由願景、信任、樂觀、熱情、目的與精神構成的正能量，這種正能量是每一個傑出的領導者、每一個夢想或願景實現、每一個卓有成就的人生，以及每一個幸福家庭不可或缺的關鍵要素之一。
本書作者高登汲取他與無數領導者、銷售專業人士、團隊、非營利組織、學校及運動員合作的經驗心得，在這個引人入勝的小故事中，分享精闢洞察、可行動的策略，以及充滿感染力的正能量。想把負能量轉變為幫助成就更大的正能量的經理人、領導者或任何人，本書提供了勵志言語和有效方法，協助克服工作與生活中的困阻，使你和團隊擁有最佳表現。
歡迎踏上這輛「能量巴士」，這是一趟充滿啟發與激勵之旅，揭露為工作與生活注入正能量的10項祕訣，引領你以正面、積極、前瞻、宏觀的思維與心態，來看待及處理你的工作和生活，走向光明與成就。你將打開你的觀察之眼，學會享受你的人生旅程。
作者
強．高登 Jon Gordon
美國知名暢銷書作家、演講家、顧問，尤其致力於提倡正能量與正面思想，著作超過30本書，其中17本榮登暢銷書排行榜，包括《淬鍊成功人生的咖啡豆思維》（The Coffee Bean）、《過你的第二人生》（The Seed）、《記得你對自己的承諾》（The Carpenter），以及迄今已經銷售逾300萬冊的這本《能量巴士》。
高登提出的正能量生成方法，獲得無數報章雜誌及電視節目的報導，包括《今日秀》（The Today Show）、CNN、CNBC等節目頻道。他也為許多組織提供有關於正能量與正面思想的教練輔導，包括洛杉磯道奇隊、Snapchat、邁阿密熱火隊、洛杉磯公羊隊、金寶湯公司（Campbell’s Soup）、戴爾公司、西南航空、西北互惠金融公司（Northwestern Mutual）、大眾超市公司（Publix）等等。
高登畢業於康乃爾大學，擁有埃默里大學教育碩士學位。他和他的訓練顧問公司熱情致力於培養正向領導者、組織與團隊。
譯者
李芳齡
譯作超過一百五十本，包括近期出版的《麥肯錫教企業這樣用AI》、《萬物藍圖》、《持續買進》、《練好邏輯的第一堂課》、《麥肯錫最強問題解決法》、《好策略的關鍵》、《中國網路圈套》、《複利效應》。
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Globalization greatly increases leverage over opponents
I'm trying to learn more about China. This book was referenced in a book I read by U.S. General Spalding entitled "War Without Rules." The book was written by two Chinese PLA colonels and published in 1999 so it's about a quarter century old. According to General Spalding the book has been read and considered within the U.S. military. I have the paperback and it's 193 pages, not including a short afterword and some information on the authors' backgrounds. It reads fairly well although I did encounter a few places where I wasn't entirely sure what the book was trying to say. I don't know if this was due to translation challenges or it was just me. I got through the book fairly quickly.
My main takeaway was that globalization has offers a potential opponent many more levers to influence the actions of others than simply resorting to kinetic (bombs and bullets) warfare. Economic warfare is certainly possible and in the colonels' view has been resorted to by the West against Asian targets. They view George Soros as a financial terrorist who wreaked havoc on Asian economies in 1998. They describe Soros as a soldier in the wars of tomorrow. Page 191.
The inspiration for the book was the First Gulf War. The lesson that the colonels drew from this war was that it was inadvisable to fight the U.S. in a straight-up kinetic war. Finding other ways to fight the U.S. was mandatory. As I write this in January 2024 I wonder if the Chinese military will follow the colonels or if they will resort to traditional kinetic means of fighting if their leadership decides to take Taiwan.
On page 120 they describe the new model of warfare as combining the battlefield and non-battlefield exemplified by Schwarzkopf and Soros and Bin Laden and some Chinese that I don't recognize. As they say on page 120 "This then is our real hand of cards."
The book also cites a number of Chinese theorists on war, which I think I useful. I've read fairly widely, but my reading has been focused in the West. Also, the authors look at international bodies and how China might use them against the U.S.
On page 164 the book argues that warfare is changing from "bloody massacre" and finding expression in "information warfare, financial warfare, and trade warfare". Look at the U.S. response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The colonels' thoughts are worthy of consideration. On page 110 the book observes "continuous coverage by the modern media which very much strengthens the effects of terrorism."
If the topic interests you, I recommend the book. The book may be 25 years old, but its message is timely.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2024
★★★★★ 4
Intriguing Challenges and Overblown Rhetoric
This is a useful book to read. The principles of warfare advocated by Sun Tzu say that you must know both yourself and your enemy. This book shows that modern American society is known by the Chinese military. As an exercise in cultural self-understanding alone, reading it pays dividends.
However, the topic is strategy. The words used can be relatively confusing at times, not quite embodying the meaning given to them by the authors. Unlimited...but within limits. Unrestricted...but following rules. It can be a bit of a struggle to follow their train of thought and understand their meaning (especially with the writing style, which lacks clarity or organization). Despite this I think it is worth struggling with, and especially with a broad overview of some of the argument to assist. Such a board overview follows.
The main point: the United States is prone to think in a manner which intrinsically restricts the conduct of warfare to only a formal military domain; thus it abstracts military action from its location in social domains (politics, economy, information, etc). This fits rather well. We like things to be formulas or mechanistic. We also like to abstract them away into separate ("rigidly distinct") boxes which have no interaction. And so, the military is responsible for military problems and better stay far from anything approaching politics! However, as the authors reveal, this leads to an inability to conduct grander strategy in warfare.
So instead: "unrestricted" warfare is to have strategy incorporate considerations (and interactions) within various domains, not only the military domain. Basically it is a rejection of the post-Westphalian concept of the nation-state as the supreme (and exclusive) kind of agent in strategy. This is good. The post-Westphalian idea of the nation-state may be useful in certain contexts and for certain purposes, but it is NOT the comprehensive reality of the universe. To treat it as such is to be blind to much of reality, and to live in a fantasy world. Does North Korea really care that it is "unrecognized" as a nation by us? Nope. Because the nation-state idea simply doesn't describe the order in which NK exists, so much as it describes the order in which Germany exists.
This is all well and good. But is it truly revolutionary or new? I don't think so. Clausewitz himself writes that there is no military situation abstracted from the political situation, and politics (in this sense) involves much more than just inter-governmental relations. Rather, I think that we can treat this as a corrective against modern American oversimplifications and reductions, and thus as a "return" to older concepts of strategy and statesmanship. Indeed, they even imitate and follow Clausewitz's guidance on method for determining a theory of warfare which is inductive/a posteriori, rather than deductive/a priori. Unfortunately, the one "modern" example of a war they have to analyze is the Gulf War, and so they relentlessly analyze it alone, perhaps leading to imbalance.
And here is where the rhetoric is overblown. This is no "master plan" to destroy America (false advertising). It's not even really new concepts. Rather, it is a (very) forceful reminder against the false (and harmful) modernist sentiments that prevail in America's mode of conducting warfare. In reference to false understandings, the authors actually accuse Americans of "touching the elephant" - an allusion to the tale of "blind men and the elephant" (although this allusion is not made clear in the text, and so is confusing if you have not heard of the tale). It is a parable about believing one has the absolute truth, while only having a limited perspective. Perhaps the authors also touch the elephant in a few ways (bias for helicopters without empirical evidence, a near-religious adoration of the golden ratio, etc.).
There's a final point of balance that is perhaps needed. It is easy to either dismiss the Chinese critiques of American society ("we don't worship tech") or take them too seriously ("tech is evil"). Either reaction is problematic. Instead we need to understand that just as in some other areas, there is a rhetorical/political purpose at play. America is being made fun of (which means that the critiques are both based in reality, but also somewhat biased for the sake of local humor). Technology is not evil, and technology is not God. So we need to learn to avoid seeing technological advancement as a replacement for people (this is the error the authors would like to point out). This doesn't mean avoiding technological advancement.
There are many lessons to be learned from this book. I'd advise it for all military officers to read. However, I also would advise to temper the expectations and reframe the reader's conception of what the book is: it is an exercise in recovery of some older strategic concepts, not a revolutionary approach to destroying the United States. Get past and ignore the rhetoric and advertising, and take the lessons where they make valid points about where we can be short-sighted in our mindset. But don't discount those lessons because of the wild rhetoric and advertising which surround them. Doing this, you will profit.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 1, 2022
★★★★★ 5
China’s Global Strategic Approach.
Provides an excellent understanding of China’s strategy approach — which should be occurs by now, but isn’t. Its style is probably to Asian to be appreciated by most Americans — who have never studied the classic Asian way of war — and never been to war in Asia. If interested in this subject, start with Sun Tzu, and try to think like about strategy the way the Chinese understand it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Why China is winning
Format: Hardcover
Should be mandatory reading for all men from 17 and up see why they’re going to overtake the USA unless we get our act in gear
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Outstanding book that lays out a blueprint for communist China's war against the US
A short book that sometimes slips into expressions that take a little time to understand, the two political officers that wrote this book had truly studied US (and western) military campaigns and political movements in order to develop strategies to defeat the west without kinetic warfare.
While I (like most others, I believe) understood that CCP wanted to take advantage of the US and have region dominance, this book really opened my eyes. I'll merely list the areas in which these two political officers promoted engagement against the US/west - actions that many (including myself) never realizing these were acts of "unrestricted" and comprehensive warfare. The list:
diplomatic warfare
financial warfare
conventional warfare
network warfare
trade warfare
bio-chemical warfare
intelligence warfare
resource warfare
ecological warfare
psychological warfare
economic aid warfare
space warfare
tactical warfare
regulatory warfare
electronic warfare
smuggling warfare
sanction warfare
guerrilla warfare
drug warfare
media warfare
terrorist warfare
virtual warfare (deterrence)
ideological warfare
fabrication warfare
cultural warfare
international law warfare
atomic warfare
Of course, as one recognizes these listed arenas of engagement communist China has with the US, remember that espionage and propaganda play key roles in all of these areas. While the US seeks to counter communist China individually in several of these areas, we have to realize that it is a comprehensive strategy that the CCP is pursuing. Remember this book was published in 1999. What has each side engaged in since then?
Epiphanal!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2022