Pay in installments of $39.25 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 20 - Sep 25
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
【新品】東方Project “表情豊かなポーカーフェイス” 秦こころ［軽装版］ 1/8 / キューズQ 発売日:2022年11月頃12 202211 FAQ Q 13 Project 1 821cm C
※この商品はお一人様1点のみの御購入となります。2個以上の御注文はキャンセルとなりますので御注意ください※
【発売日】2022年11月予定【発送時期】入荷次第発送
※複数の御注文は、発売日が一番遅い商品に合わせて発送となります。
※メーカー・問屋の都合により発売日から入荷が数日遅れる場合がございます。また人気商品の場合、出荷制限・配分等で御注文商品が用意できない場合がございます。
※※ご注文前にFAQを必ず御確認下さい※※
【商品名】とうほうぷろじぇくと はたのこころ
【ジャンル】キューズQ
--------------------------------------
発送後の注文キャンセルが多発しており、1万円を超える商品・又は注文金額合計で3万円を超える御注文は代金引換以外のお支払い方法にて御注文ください。
代金引換で御注文頂いた場合、当店判断にて御注文をキャンセルする場合がございます。
予約商品はメーカー様より事前予告なく、発売間際になって弊社納品数量が大幅に減数・カットされることがございます。
その場合、お客様のご注文に対応できない場合もございます。
---------------------
我こそは秦こころ。感情を司る者。
「東方Project」から付喪神（つくもがみ）秦こころが再び登場！
前作から薙刀やお面、エフェクトパーツを外した軽装版としてのリリースになります。新規造形の腕と扇子で、能を舞うポーズに再構成。
圧倒的なバルーンスカートは、プレーンな状態での造形をお楽しみいただけます。
原型製作：目出ル金
彩色製作：五日市 歩
イラストレーション：君と子音
スケール：1/8スケール（全高：約21cm）
（C）上海アリス幻樂団
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 30 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public.
1. Ignores public opinion.
The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision.
2. Starts with a strange premise.
The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit?
3. Offers dubious legal advice.
In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize.
4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes.
The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion.
If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025