SKU: 76592692961

Biotinylated GCGR/Glucagon Receptor His&Avi Tag Protein, Human

Sale price$241.20 Regular price$268.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $67.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 20 - Sep 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Biotinylated GCGR/Glucagon Receptor His&Avi Tag Protein, HumanProduct Specification Species Human Synonyms Glucagon R, GCGR,Glucagon receptor Accession P47871 Amino Acid Sequence Ala26 Lys136, with C terminal His and Avitag Expression System HEK293 Molecular Weight 30 43kDa (Reducing) Purity 95% by SDS PAGE Endotoxin <1EU g Physical Appearance Lyophilized Powder Storage Buffer PBS, pH7. 4. Reconstitution Reconstitute at 0. 1 1 mg ml according to the size in ultrapure water after rapid centrifugation. Stability &

Product Specification


Species Human
Synonyms Glucagon R, GCGR,Glucagon receptor
Accession P47871
Amino Acid Sequence Ala26-Lys136, with C-terminal His and Avitag
Expression System HEK293
Molecular Weight

30-43kDa (Reducing)

Purity >95% by SDS-PAGE
Endotoxin <1EU/μg
Physical Appearance Lyophilized Powder
Storage Buffer PBS, pH7.4.
Reconstitution

Reconstitute at 0.1-1 mg/ml according to the size in ultrapure water after rapid centrifugation.

Stability & Storage · 12 months from date of receipt, lyophilized powder stored at -20 to -80℃.
· 3 months, -20 to -80℃ under sterile conditions after reconstitution.
· 1 week, 2 to 8℃ under sterile conditions after reconstitution.
· Please avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Reference

1. Michelle L. Boland, Rhianna C. Laker, Karly Mather, Arkadiusz Nawrocki, Stephanie Oldham, Brandon B. Boland, Hilary Lewis, James Conway, Jacqueline Naylor, Silvia Guionaud, Michael Feigh, Sanne S. Veidal, Louise Lantier, Owen P. McGuinness, Joseph Grimsby, Cristina M. Rondinone, Lutz Jermutus, Martin R. Larsen, James L. Trevaskis & Christopher J. Rhodes: Resolution of NASH and hepatic fibrosis by the GLP-1R and GCGR dual-agonist cotadutide via modulating mitochondrial function and lipogenesis. Nature Metabolism volume 2, pages413–431 (2020).

Background

The glucagon receptor (GCGR) is a Class B GPCR that has an important role in maintenance of glucose homeostasis and, as such, is considered to be a valuable target for the treatment of diabetes. The GCGR is widely expressed and can be found in the liver, adipose tissue, heart, kidney, pancreatic islets, stomach, small intestine, thyroid, and skeletal muscle. The GCGR is coupled to the activation of adenylate cyclase via Gs, with concomitant rise in cellular cyclic AMP levels and activation of protein kinase A (PKA). GCGR mRNA has been detected in islets. In vitro/ex vivo studies suggest that glucagon potentiates insulin secretion from isolated islets, although the potency is considerably less than that of the insulin secretagogue GLP-1. Mutations of the GCGR gene are associated with congenital noninsulin-dependent diabetes, and inhibition of GCGR in vivo lowers blood glucose and improves glucose tolerance in obese diabetic mice.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 76592692961

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S. Langley
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025

recommand products