SKU: 1085170624

2017-2020 ELECTRA GLIDE STANDARD POLICE FLHTP Stator Alternator 48A 29900042A

Sale price$89.80 Regular price$99.78
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $24.95 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 8 - Oct 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

2017-2020 ELECTRA GLIDE STANDARD POLICE FLHTP Stator Alternator 48A 29900042A18 Pole 3 Phase Alternator Stator Fit for Touring Model 2017 2024 29900042A Features: Direct replacement to your original unit Plug and play, direct fit, easy installation. Highest grade lamination materials. Connector included. Mounting bolt NOT included. Rubber grommet included. All products shipped are tested. Specifications: Condition: Aftermarket 100% Brand New Quanity: 1PC Type: Stator Alternator Voltage Amperage: 13. 5V 48A other

18-Pole 3-Phase Alternator Stator Fit for Touring Model 2017-2024 - 29900042A

Features:
Direct replacement to your original unit
Plug-and-play, direct fit, easy installation.
Highest grade lamination materials.
Connector included.
Mounting bolt NOT included.
Rubber grommet included.
All products shipped are tested.

Specifications:
Condition: Aftermarket 100% Brand New
Quanity: 1PC
Type: Stator Alternator
Voltage/Amperage: 13.5V/ 48A

other specifications:
Number of wires: 3
Number of plugs: 1
Number of pins: 3
Number of fixation holes: 5
Number of poles: 18

Please compare the number of pins and plugs with the old part before purchasing.

Dimensions:
Interior diameter: 64.6 mm
Exterior diameter: 144 mm

(Please compare the size with the old part before purchasing.)

Replacement Part Number:
29900042A

(Use the part number to verify fitment to your application. )

Fits Model/Year:
Fit for CVO TRI GLIDE FLHTCUTGSE 2022
Fit for CVO ROAD GLIDE FLTRXSE 2017-2022
Fit for CVO STREET GLIDE FLHXSE 2017-2022
Fit for CVO ULTRA LIMITED FLHTKSE 2018-2022
Fit for CVO ULTRA LIMITED ANNIVERSARY FLHTKSE ANV 2018/2023
Fit for ELECTRA GLIDE STANDARD POLICE FLHTP 2017-2020
Fit for ELECTRA GLIDE ULTRA CLASSIC FLHTCU 2017
Fit for FREEWHEELER FLRT 2017
Fit for ROAD GLIDE FLTRX 2017
Fit for ROAD GLIDE SPECIAL FLTRXS 2017
Fit for ROAD GLIDE ULTRA FLTRU 2017
Fit for ROAD KING FLHR 2017
Fit for ROAD KING CLASSIC FLHRC 2017
Fit for ROAD KING POLICE FLHP 2017-2020
Fit for ROAD KING SPECIAL FLHRXS 2017
Fit for STREET GLIDE FLHX 2017
Fit for STREET GLIDE SPECIAL FLHXS 2017
Fit for TRI GLIDE ULTRA FLHTCUTG 2017
Fit for ULTRA LIMITED FLHTK 2017
Fit for ULTRA LIMITED LOW FLHTKL 2017
Fit for ULTRA LIMITED SHRINE FLHTK SHRINE 2017
Fit for TRIKE FREEWHEELER FLRT 2018-2024
Fit for TRIKE ROAD GLIDE 3 FLTRT 2023-2024
Fit for TRIKE TRI GLIDE ULTRA FLHTCUTG 2018-2024
Fit for TRIKE TRI GLIDE ULTRA ANNIVERSARY FLHTCUTG ANV 2018/2023
Fit for TOURING REVIVAL FLH 2021
Fit for TOURING ELECTRA GLIDE ULTRA CLASSIC FLHTCU 2018-2019
Fit for TOURING ELECTRA GLIDE STANDARD FLHT 2019-2022
Fit for TOURING ELECTRA GLIDE HIGHWAY KING FLHFB 2023
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE FLTRX 2018-2023
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE SPECIAL FLTRXS 2018-2020
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE SPECIAL ST FLTRXST 2022-2023
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE ULTRA FLTRU 2018-2019
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE ST FLTRXST 2023
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE ANNIVERSARY FLTRXSANV 2023
Fit for TOURING ROAD GLIDE LIMITED FLTRK 2020-2024
Fit for TOURING ROAD KING FLHR 2018-2022
Fit for TOURING ROAD KING CLASSIC FLHRC 2018-2019
Fit for TOURING ROAD KING SPECIAL FLHRXS 2018-2024
Fit for TOURING STREET GLIDE FLHX 2018-2023
Fit for TOURING STREET GLIDE ANNIVERSARY FLHX ANV 2018
Fit for TOURING STREET GLIDE SPECIAL FLHXS 2018-2023
Fit for TOURING STREET GLIDE SPECIAL ST FLHXST 2022-2023
Fit for TOURING STREET GLIDE SPECIAL ANNIVERSARY FLHXS ANX 2018/2023
Fit for TOURING ULTRA LIMITED FLHTK 2018-2024
Fit for TOURING ULTRA LIMITED ANNIVERSARY FLHTK ANV 2018/2023
Fit for TOURING ULTRA LIMITED LOW FLHTKL 2018-2019
Fit for TOURING ULTRA LIMITED SHRINE EDITION FLHTK SHRINE 2018-2023
Fit for SOFTAIL BREAKOUT FXBR 2018-2019
Fit for SOFTAIL BREAKOUT 114 FXBRS 2018-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL BREAKOUT 114 ANNIVERSARY FXBRS ANX 2018
Fit for SOFTAIL DELUXE FLDE 2018-2020
Fit for SOFTAIL FAT BOB FXFB 2018-2020
Fit for SOFTAIL FAT BOB 114 FXFBS 2018-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL FAT BOY FLFB 2018--2020
Fit for SOFTAIL FAT BOY 114 FLFBS 2018-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL FAT BOY 114 ANNIVERSARY FLFBS ANV 2018-2020/2023
Fit for SOFTAIL FAT BOY 114 ANNIVERSARY FLFBS ANX 2018
Fit for SOFTAIL FXDR 114 FXDRS 2019-2020
Fit for SOFTAIL HERITAGE CLASSIC FLHC 2018-2021
Fit for SOFTAIL HERITAGE CLASSIC 114 FLHCS 2018-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL HERITAGE CLASSIC 114 ANNIVERSARY FLHCS ANV 2018/2023
Fit for SOFTAIL HYDRA GLIDE REVIVAL FLI 2024
Fit for SOFTAIL LOW RIDER FXLR 2018-2020
Fit for SOFTAIL LOW RIDER S FXLRS 2020-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL LOW RIDER ST FXLRST 2022-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL LOW RIDER EL DIABLO FXRST 2022
Fit for SOFTAIL SLIM FLSL 2018-2021
Fit for SOFTAIL SPORT GLIDE FLSB 2018-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL SOFTAIL SLIM FLSL 2020
Fit for SOFTAIL SOFTAIL STANDARD FXST 2021-2023
Fit for SOFTAIL STREET BOB FXBB 2018-2020
Fit for SOFTAIL STREET BOB 114 FXBBS 2022-2024
Fit for SOFTAIL STANDARD FXST 2020-2022
Fit for POLICE ELECTRA GLIDE STANDARD POLICE FLHTP 2019
Fit for POLICE ELECTRA GLIDE FLHTP 2021-2024
Fit for POLICE ROAD KING POLICE FLHP 2019
Fit for POLICE ROAD KING FLHP 2021-2024
Fit for POLICE ROAD GLIDE FLTRXP 2024

Please check and see if your stator pole's number as same as our and your connectors and harness looks like the one in the photo before purchasing.

(Compatibility Chart is for Reference ONLY!!!)
(Please Compare with Your faulty unit and the image we provided to Decide Fitments)

Package Included:
1x 18-Pole Stator Generator

NOTICE:
Before installing your new stator

Check the AC output of the stator.
Replace any burned or corroded connectors on stator and regulator/rectifier.
Check and repair any melted wiring.
Use hi-temp dielectric grease on all connectors
Our stator may use a different wire color code than your original.
All of the wires are installed in the correct order; please do not change any of the wiring configurations.
This stator is designed as a direct plug-in replacement and should be used as such.
When bolting stator in, always use locking compound.
If our stator includes a pickup coil, always make sure the air gap is correct upon installation.

All item pictures are accurate; if in doubt do not hesitate to compare our item to your original part.

Battery condition is important. No stator can make up for a bad or weak battery. If in doubt charge your battery and have it load tested, or simply replace it.
ALWAYS START WITH A FULLY CHARGED BATTERY !

The product on offer is an accessory or spare part and thus is not an original product of the vehicle manufacturer.
The name of the vehicle manufacturer is stated only as an indication of the determination of the product being offered as an accessory or spare part, to clarify, for which vehicle the product on offer fits.

Warranty:
Returns: Customers have the right to apply for a return within 60 days after the receipt of the product
24-Hour Expert Online: Solve your installation and product problems

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 1085170624

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
Terry Anne
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020

recommand products