SKU: 90727586173

Antique Rose Cut Diamond Cluster Ring in 9 Carat Gold

Sale price$386.08 Regular price$428.98
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $107.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 1 - Aug 6

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Antique Rose Cut Diamond Cluster Ring in 9 Carat GoldA beautifully unusual antique cluster ring. Dating to around 1900 this jewel showcases a captivating blend of diamond cuts! At its centre sits a fancy rose cut diamond, its softly faceted dome catching the light with a gentle, glassy shimmer. Surrounding this is a halo of old cut diamonds, each hand cut and contrasting beautifully with the larger facets of the central stone. Created at the turn of the 20th century, the ring carries the charm of late

A beautifully unusual antique cluster ring. Dating to around 1900 this jewel showcases a captivating blend of diamond cuts!

At its centre sits a fancy rose cut diamond, its softly faceted dome catching the light with a gentle, glassy shimmer. Surrounding this is a halo of old cut diamonds, each hand cut and contrasting beautifully with the larger facets of the central stone.

Created at the turn of the 20th century, the ring carries the charm of late Victorian to early Edwardian design, where craftsmanship and design were highly regarded. Unusual and full of antique character, this is a wonderful piece for those drawn to subtle variations in diamond cutting and the quiet beauty of period jewellery.

DETAILS 

ERA: Antique 

DIAMOND: Centre stone is approx 0.25-0.30ct F-G and Si. The diamonds surrounding total 0.20ct approx.

MATERIAL/HALLMARK: Unhallmarked minimum 9 carat gold with a silver setting. 

FINGER SIZE N (UK/AU) 6.75 (US)

WEIGHT: 4.9 grams in total approximately 

Condition: This is overall in good antique condition there is little wear/patina overall. One facet on the main diamond has a nibble crack however the diamond is secure and this is subtle to the naked eye. 

 

Please note the antique ring box is for display only



-Please feel free to take a look at all photographs for condition before committing to buy. We do not offer refunds so if in doubt drop us and email and wed be happy to help!

-We ship worldwide on all orders & parcels are sent fully insured and well packed in our signature pink boxes

-We accept all methods of payment, and orders will be shipped out within 1-3 business days.

-All customs information is declared and we are not responsible for any import duties or delays incurred.

> All of the jewels we work with are antique or vintage and as such they are sold ‘as seen. This means theyre not perfect. They carry the love and journey of generations who love them before. These jewels should be worn with extra and love and care.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 90727586173

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jessica Burdett
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Best socks!
Size: Medium, Color: Blue
I love these socks! They last for years and they fit so nicely on my feet. I love that I can wear the in tennis shoes or wool boots and they never move!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
john jeffrey elliott
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 1
TOO SMALL
Size: Medium, Color: Blue
Nice socks, but they are way too small. Says they fit size 6 - 10. I kept 3 ( I wear size 8) and gave 3 to my daughter (size 8.5). We both agreed that they were just too small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mar Gee
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Style and comfort
Size: Medium, Color: Black
Exactly what I was looking for. Style and sock thickness and comfort.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable
Size: Medium, Color: Blue
So comfortable! They stay up perfectly love love love
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 7, 2025
W
Verified Purchase
Will
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent all-poly athletic socks for general lifting and HIIT.
Size: Medium, Color: Black/White/Grey
***These are NOT “low” -cut socks as the description in the title states. These are actually “quarter”-cut socks as clearly visible in the picture of the sock itself. “Low” -cut socks are shorter than this height but still visible with a shoe. Also, on the actual UA package of these socks, it clearly states these are QUARTER cut socks. My review: Gave these UA Performance Tech socks (UAPT) 5 stars since they’re very good but in all reality not the best socks I’ve ever had for lifting and HIIT workouts. That title goes to Nike Dri-Fit MAX socks (DFM)….but these socks are really good. Like Nike’s DFM’s, these UAPT socks come in sizes, halleluah (M, L, and XL). The idea that most athletic sock are sized 6-12 and should therefore fit everyone perfectly is absolutely ridiculous. Your shoes come in whole and half sizes…so socks should at the very least be sized like these UAPT’s and Nike DFM’s…in S/M/L or in this case, M/L/XL. I wear a men’s size 8 shoe and the M (medium) size in these socks was a perfect fit; true to size. Also, UAPT socks are ALL polyester with Spandex which is ideal and 100% that which you want for athletic socks: wicking with stretch. Cotton socks are the absolute worst thing you could wear to the gym since they’re sponges for sweat and therefore get wet and heavy, cause blisters, tend to stink, stick to skin, etc… IF you prefer cotton socks for athletics, then you don’t understand how performance fabrics work in athletics and training. You do NOT want cotton in your athletic apparel. You want your fabrics that wick sweat away; NOT soak up sweat and hold onto it. Also, the flexibility and stretch of the foot and ankle parts of the sock were both just right. Snug but not too tight. Wicking is perfect, too. Already worn during two 3 1/2 hour workouts and my feet stayed as dry as a desert. When looking for UA athletic socks on Amazon, I surprisingly continued to find UA “athletic” socks made with mostly cotton which completely surprised me because a serious athletic company should produce an abundance of performance-level socks… i.e. all-poly socks. Thank goodness I finally came across these UA all-poly Performance Techs. The only drawback to these UAPT’s…and it’s a minor drawback…is that unlike Nike DFM’s, these do not come in L & R (left and rights) to specifically match the individual foot shape. Nike DFM socks come in L and R which sets them apart from all other athletic socks…and yet I don’t like supporting a massive monopolistic athletic apparel company like Nike, but they’re the only one that makes THE best athletic sock. Nonetheless, these UAPT’s are perfect workout/HIIT/lifting socks for the bundle value price of six pair and three colors. If you’re looking to match your new UA or Rock shoes with the appropriate UA athletic sock, then here you go. I chose the black/white/gray mix bundle since I have new pairs of a black and a white version of the same UA-Rock shoe. These UAPT socks are medium thickness so they didn’t take up an exorbitant amount of room in my shoes but they’re thick enough to prevent blisters and provide cushion. Overall they’re very comfortable, hold a good stretch, hold their shape, and seem to be durable but only time will tell. And since we’re on the black and white sock subject, I couldn’t resist: I read a shoe review about someone angered that his new UA/Rock black shoes (obviously bought for casual wear in lieu of gym use) staining his white cotton socks. First of all, never ever wear white socks (much less cotton white socks) with black athletic shoes! The possibility of staining is always there and the appearance just doesn’t work. However, you can get away with black socks with white shoes in some cases…but never white socks with black shoes. Why? Who knows? It’s just one of those unwritten rules of the gym. And no, I didn’t make the rules…so don’t blame the messenger. LOL!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2025

recommand products