SKU: 98382252360

Caroline County, Virginia Colonial Census, 1650-1773: St. Mary's District, 1650-1770; Drysdale District, 1655-1773; St. Margaret's District, 1673-1770

Sale price$36.00 Regular price$40.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $10.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Caroline County, Virginia Colonial Census, 1650-1773: St. Mary's District, 1650-1770; Drysdale District, 1655-1773; St. Margaret's District, 1673-1770Abstracted by Ray Campbell. Indexed. FROM THE PREFACE: This work is based on other secondary sources. These sources are primarily the Cavaliers & Pioneers series of abstracts of Virginia Land Patents by Nell M. Nugent and the Virginia Genealogical Society and Colonial Caroline by T. E. Campbell. No one canvassed Caroline County in the seventeenth century with a clipboard and questionnaire containing queries such as What is your median income and how

Abstracted by Ray Campbell. Indexed.

FROM THE PREFACE:

This work is based on other secondary sources. These sources are primarily the Cavaliers & Pioneers series of abstracts of Virginia Land Patents by Nell M. Nugent and the Virginia Genealogical Society and Colonial Caroline by T.E. Campbell.

...No one canvassed Caroline County in the seventeenth century with a clipboard and questionnaire containing queries such as “What is your median income and how many individuals are in the household?” In fact, no census was taken in Virginia until the year, 1790. This “constructed” census is my best guess as to who most probably would have arrived in the area to become Caroline County in a particular year. This book attempts to list those individuals who received a land grant (patentees) and those individuals who were arriving in Virginia (transported). No death records have survived for the early period and the mortality must be presumed to be high.

Caroline was formed from three parent counties: Essex, King & Queen and King William. Essex was formed from Old Rappahannock County and included everything in the watershed of the Rappahannock River. King William County was formed from King & Queen, which previously had been formed from New Kent County. Each county contained at least one established Parish of the Church of England (Anglican). Thus there were three parishes in the area to become Caroline prior to the establishment of the county in 1727/8: St. Mary’s (Essex), Drysdale (King & Queen) and St.Margaret’s (King William). The ancient parish registers for all three of these parishes are missing and presumed destroyed.

...Through his representatives, the King of England gave fifty acres of land to every person who immigrated into the Colony of Virginia. These “head-rights” could be bought and sold between parties. The enforcement seems to be a bit slack, in my opinion. For instance, you often see two people of the same or similar names claiming a headright in two different locations on the same date or within a short period of time. The probability of two distinct individuals having an extremely unusual name and appearing in close proximity at practically the same time approaches the realm of impossibility. As the population increased over time, the Crown came to accept cash payments for land grants as well as transportation of an immigrant. If a grant lists a monetary consideration but has no acreage listed, then it is possible to calculate the acreage from the sales price by examining grants that give both consideration as well as acreage.

...I have tried to insert my notes on the geography, family names and place names in this work as well as some references to adjacent land owners. These notes are placed in brackets [ ] while the notes and edits of the authors of the source materials are placed in parentheses ( )....

Finally, this work is not intended as the only possible list of inhabitants who resided Caroline in any particular year. There may have been and most probably were other people who settled in Caroline without receiving a land grant or obtaining a head-right. Some hearty individuals such as Howell Powell may have just come into the county and hacked a homestead out of wilderness without bothering to obtain a headright or file any claim. Times were both good and bad and Caroline had both good and bad people. Additionally, things were always on the move as people came and went. This area was just as “wild and woolly” as any place in the Old West. It takes an especially hearty person to face the hardships of the frontier and it takes that same determination to face new challenges once the old frontier has vanished and new horizons appear.

Sample [Pages 17-18]

ST MARY'S
1665
Barrow, Jno. 600 ac On freshes of Rappahannock River;
September 25, 1665 on S.W. side of Powmansend [Peumansend] Creek; next
[to] Clement Herbert's land & running to a white
oak that parts this from the land of Jno. Prosier
near said creek.

Due for transportation of 12 persons:
       Barrow, Ann
       Godale, Willim
       Hues, Mary
       Jenkins, Alexander
       Jones, Mary
       Nicholls, Henry
       Smith, Arthur
       Toms, Mary
       Watts, Stephen
       Williams, Jonathan
       Wood, James
       Young, Anthony

              Cavaliers & Pioneers Vol. I page 526
              Patent Book 5 page 407 (468).
       [Ann Barrow listed as imported and thus may be related to Patentee.]

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 98382252360

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Stacie alba
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Great fun
Color: Red + Yellow
Dogs love it and very durable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
James Mcdaniel III
New York, US
★★★★★ 3
Bigger than expected.
Color: Red + Yellow
It's nice for a large breed dogs but not for my 8 lbs. she was not interested on this chew toy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2025
D
Verified Purchase
David Pandullo
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 1
Not very durable
It took my dog less than 5 minutes to chew off one side of handle. The rest of the ball seems to be durable with him chewing and playing with it. Very disappointing since wanted to use the handle for tug a war with dog.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Super fun
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 9, 2025
W
W J T
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
A Jolly Ball - A Treat Ball!
Color: Red + Yellow
In the past, I got my girls a doggie jolly ball. They played with that thing until they tore it apart! I've also gotten them several different, but similar, treat balls over the years. Fast forward to present! I found the best of both worlds! A Jolly Treat Ball! Upon receiving these two balls, first, I was so glad to find that they didn't stink! Literally, no terrible smell! YAY! Second, the jolly treat balls are durable. I placed a large treat in each of the balls and handed them over. Each girl took the ball by the handle and pranced to their desired location to devour their treat! Devour, they did... NOT! Because of the durability and construction of these balls, it took them a good 5 minutes to fully get each morsel of their large cookie! YAY! Once emptied, I asked them to bring it. They each picked up their ball, by the handle and brought it to me. Too cute - they each got just one more treat! Now that they've utilized their jolly treat ball I have yet to see a single tooth mark in the ball. It has withstood their chewing to release the treat and hasn't been marred or scarred by their strong teeth. I've also had the opportunity; after each use, to wash the jolly treat balls. They even withstand a scrubby to get them cleaned! If I could, this "Durable Dog Chew Ball Toy" would get 10 stars! I'm one happy dog momma!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 31, 2024

recommand products