SKU: 12351197318

CIRCUM aluminium plantenbak rond ø60x100 cm met bodem

$430.20 $478.00
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on 2pierres.com >

Pay in installments of $119.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

CIRCUM aluminium plantenbak rond ø60x100 cm met bodemAluminium plantenbak CIRCUM met bodem ronde vorm, krachtige uitstraling De aluminium plantenbak CIRCUM met bodem is een stijlvolle, ronde blikvanger met een duurzame en tijdloze uitstraling. De cilindervorm zorgt voor een krachtige, maar tegelijkertijd rustige en vriendelijke uitstraling. Hierdoor brengt deze plantenbak balans in iedere tuin, op ieder terras of bij een entree van een woning of bedrijfspand. Dankzij het strakke ontwerp past de CIRCUM

Aluminium plantenbak CIRCUM met bodem – ronde vorm, krachtige uitstraling

De aluminium plantenbak CIRCUM met bodem is een stijlvolle, ronde blikvanger met een duurzame en tijdloze uitstraling. De cilindervorm zorgt voor een krachtige, maar tegelijkertijd rustige en vriendelijke uitstraling. Hierdoor brengt deze plantenbak balans in iedere tuin, op ieder terras of bij een entree van een woning of bedrijfspand.

Dankzij het strakke ontwerp past de CIRCUM moeiteloos in zowel moderne als klassieke tuinen. De geïntegreerde bodem met afwateringsgaten maakt de plantenbak direct geschikt voor plaatsing op bestrating of een terras. Overtollig water wordt gecontroleerd afgevoerd, zodat jouw beplanting optimaal kan groeien.

De plantenbak is vervaardigd uit hoogwaardig aluminium en is geschikt voor gebruik in alle seizoenen. Hij kan het hele jaar buiten blijven staan zonder te beschadigen of kapot te vriezen. Dankzij de sterke constructie, duurzame poedercoating en hoogwaardige afwerking geniet je jarenlang zorgeloos van deze aluminium plantenbak. Uiteraard profiteer je van gratis verzending.

Specificaties

• RAL-kleuren: 7016 (antracietgrijs) | 7021 (zwartgrijs) | 9005 (gitzwart) | 9016 (verkeerswit)
• Materiaal: Aluminium
• Materiaaldikte: 3 mm
• Bovenrand: 50 × 25 mm
• Gewicht: ca. 18 kg
• Voetjes: 15 mm hoog
• Afwateringsgaten: ø 27 mm
• Garantie: 5 jaar
• Maatwerk: mogelijk op aanvraag

Pluspunten

• Voorzien van vaste bodem met afwateringsgaten
• Duurzame en krasvaste poedercoating
• Vorstbestendig en corrosiebestendig
• Licht van gewicht, maar zeer sterk en vormvast
• Tijdloos rond design met hoogwaardige afwerking
• Blind koppelbaar voor strakke plaatsing in series
• Voldoet aan hoge Europese kwaliteitsstandaard
• Maatwerk en extra opties beschikbaar

Materiaal

De CIRCUM plantenbak is vervaardigd uit 3 mm dik aluminium. Dit materiaal is licht, slijtvast en van nature bestand tegen corrosie, waardoor het uitermate geschikt is voor langdurig buitengebruik.

Na productie wordt het oppervlak opgeruwd om een optimale hechting van de poedercoating te garanderen. Vervolgens wordt een sterke primer aangebracht met daarover een harde, slijtvaste toplaag. Deze afwerking zorgt voor een krasvaste, kleurvaste en onderhoudsarme plantenbak die jarenlang mooi blijft.

Belangrijk

• Pak het product direct na ontvangst uit om vlekvorming door opgesloten vocht te voorkomen
• Houd de afwateringsgaten vrij voor een goede drainage
• Niet boren of slijpen zonder voorschrift, dit leidt tot vervallen van de garantie
• Reinig de plantenbak jaarlijks met schoon leidingwater en een mild onderhoudsmiddel
• Gebruik geen hogedrukreiniger of schuurspons, deze kunnen de coating beschadigen

Beplantingsadvies

• Aluminium plantenbakken zijn standaard niet volledig waterdicht
• Plaats eventuele overlooppijpjes in de daarvoor voorziene gaten
• Breng onderin circa 10 cm drainagemateriaal aan
• Leg hierop een waterdoorlatend anti-worteldoek
• Vul de plantenbak met aarde die geschikt is voor jouw type beplanting

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 12351197318

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jamie N.Campbell
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
A fresh historical perspective to the Resurrection! -by Jamie D.
Format: Paperback
Although there have been countless books written about the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from a theological perspective, few have successfully tackled the Resurrection from the historical perspective. Dr. Licona has successfully done just that, applying a historical methodology to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. In his opening chapter, Dr. Licona begins by defining what is meant by history, the methods that one employs to study history as well as the limitations that comes when one studies history. It is here that he introduces useful terms to the readers that are re-introduce in subsequent chapter. Horizon, a synonym for bias, can play a critical role in how one perceives and presents history to others. To reduce horizon, Dr. Licona believes that there are six main principles that can help an historian maintain a more objective perspective when reporting history. One of these main principles is that of “historical bedrock” a consensus of what is majorly accepted and infrequently debated. Not only is a consensus important when one considers a hypothesis but a hypothesis that has a solid explanation is important as well. For a hypothesis to have the weight of believability, it must stand up to five different criteria as well. In chapter 2, Dr. Licona then turns his attention to the subject of miracles and their role in history and successfully debunks the most common presuppositions cited by the world’s most famous skeptics against the historicity of miracles. It is in chapter 3 that Dr. Licona employs the historical method to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by examining both biblical and extrabiblical writings spanning within 200 years of the event. Upon the review of these various writings, he assigns a rating from “unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probably, indeterminate and not useful” to determine if they contain any historical weight in its regard to the independent testimony of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The historical bedrock principle is re-introduced into chapter 4 and is applied not only to the death of Jesus Christ but to His life as well. Dr. Licona notes that there many aspects of the Jesus’ life and death that are considered historical bedrock even among those with varied agendas. Dr. Licona concludes his book by examining some of the leading naturalistic hypotheses touted from the most prominent liberal and skeptics in this field. By employing the five criteria that gives the historian the most successful explanation, Licona concludes that it is not the naturalistic hypothesis which fits regarding the Resurrection, but the supernatural one. The supernatural hypothesis of the Resurrection is the most solid explanation since it fulfills both historical bedrock as well as meeting all five criteria for the best explanation and thus should be considered by any credible historian as a well attested event that occurred in the past. In summary, I highly recommend this book. As a believer of 40+ years, I learned things about my faith that I did not know about before. For example, I learned how the kerygma, an early Christian creed, lends historical weight to the Resurrection. My advice for believers is not to be intimidated by the voluminous size of this book. It was certainly well worth the read. Dr. Licona has done an excellent job in presenting the material through the perspective of a historian, so much so that one may temporarily forget that he is a theologian as well! Despite the myriad of footnotes peppered through the pages, the book was very easy to read and digest. In short, a must read for those who want to have a better understanding in how to engage skeptics from a different perspective when discussing the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Get it! You’ll feel that much smarter and grounded in the faith once you’ve read the last page!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2021
J
Verified Purchase
John Keller
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Don’t be intimidated...it's detailed, but systematic and rational
Format: Paperback
Don’t be intimidated by this 700-page tome. Once you factor in the bibliography, index and footnotes, the body of the work is only about 400 pages. Licona includes an all-important, detailed outline for quick reference back to key topics, and it’s valuable because of the variety of issues he tackles. I’d say, he does a wonderful job of giving us an objective, systematic approach to addressing the historicity of the events following Jesus’ crucifixion. Licona lays the groundwork for his examination of the issue by considering the philosophy of history and tackling things like what is truth, what makes something a historical fact, who has the burden of proof, and is history a science? As a needed addition to this philosophical introduction, he spends time outlining the methods he will use to approaching relevant texts, claims of miracles, and consensus facts. Most important, I think, to his methods was his self-examination of potential bias due to personal belief and worldview. He addresses what he calls a personal “horizon” that historians must be set aside in order to be objective and get at the truth. He certainly points it out in others along the way and makes it clear throughout the book that he is trying to identify and eliminate any potential bias he may bring to the process. In his investigation, he addresses the most important sources related to Jesus’ life, crucifixion and claims of the resurrection. He deals with both Christian and non-Christian sources that were written immediately following the events as well as within the following 200 years. Licona makes the case for authenticity and credibility of the most important sources, and where there have been challenges to these sources over the centuries, he addresses those challenges head on. Ultimately, he boils the events, claims, facts and sources down to what he calls the “bedrock” pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This bedrock consists of three facts that are well supported by authentic, textual evidence which enjoy nearly consensus support by all historians (both Christian and non-Christian). For Licona, the bedrock which need be answered are (1) Jesus’ death by crucifixion, (2) the claims Jesus appeared to individuals and groups following his burial, and (3) the conversion of the Church persecutor, Paul. Ultimately, Licona breaks down six different hypotheses which claim to explain the bedrock and he uses systematic criteria for weighing those hypotheses. He concludes that a resurrection is the best explanation but admits that it’s only by setting aside a naturalistic worldview that one can embrace the conclusion. I like Licona’s methodical approach but would offer two critiques. Do we really need all the Greek citations written out? I understand that there is nuance and variations in meaning for words that are used in the original sources, but to give us all the text and the translation seemed superfluous. Second, I think it was a cop-out to skim the importance of the empty tomb. Other historians put the fact of the empty tomb as one of their top facts to be explained, but Licona punted on it because he didn’t feel it received universal consensus. Consensus aside, the fact of the empty tomb does receive support by a strong majority of scholars, even ones that do not support the resurrection. This cross-section of scholarly support, along with the volume and type of textural evidence, namely the confirmation by Christian enemies, should have elevated the fact of the empty tomb to the “bedrock” which require explanation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2021
E
Verified Purchase
Elly
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
so helpful
Format: Paperback
got for school and used it a lot its been so helpful
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
E
Verified Purchase
E
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Great price...
Format: Paperback
Needed this for my EKG course. Price was right.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
LUCIOUS
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Satisfied
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
Brand new got here on time, haven’t got to indulge in the content yet but definitely exactly what I ordered.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2025

recommand products

Voel je veilig Menstruatiecup - Lichtblauw
11.95
Biokat's White Dream Classic 12 LTR
21.95
Twink - ULTRASKYN Masturbator Kont
38.95
Shunga - Massage Gel Exotische Vruchten
29.95
Orlux Lori 700 GR
17.95