Pay in installments of $5.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 27 - Oct 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Hairwonder Colour & Care 7.3 medium gold blond 100 MilliliterHairwonder Colour & Care 7. 3 medium gold blond Hairwonder Colour & Care kleurt, beschermt, verzorgt en versterkt het haar in n behandeling. Nog nooit was een langdurig houdbare haarkleuring zonder ammonia verrijkt met zoveel goeds uit de natuur. Maar liefst 9 gecertificeerd biologische ingredinten beschermen de haarstructuur en geven het haar een optimale verzorging en briljante glans. Hierbij wordt kleurvervaging tegengegaan, de haarstructuur
Hairwonder Colour & Care 7.3 medium gold blondHairwonder Colour & Care kleurt, beschermt, verzorgt en versterkt het haar in één behandeling. Nog nooit was een langdurig houdbare haarkleuring zonder ammonia verrijkt met zoveel goeds uit de natuur.
Maar liefst 9 gecertificeerd biologische ingrediënten beschermen de haarstructuur en geven het haar een optimale verzorging en briljante glans. Hierbij wordt kleurvervaging tegengegaan, de haarstructuur versterkt en de kleur optimaal beschermd tegen UV stralen. Biologische Argan olie, Phytokeratine & Provitamine B5 werken haarversterkend, hydraterend en maken het haar zijdezacht. Colour & Care zorgt voor een perfecte grijsdekking en houdt 6 - 8 weken.
Ingrediënten (INCI)
Colour & care medium golden blond 7.3: Aqua, Cocamide mea, Ceteareth-6, Ethanolamine, Polysorbate 80, Cetearyl alcohol, Parfum, Sodium sulfite, Glycerin, Asorbic acid, Trisodium HEDTA, Toluene-2,5-diamine sulfate, Panthenol, 2-amino-6-chloro-4-nitrophenol, 2-methylresorcinol, Argania spinosa oil, 4-amino-m-cresol, Hydrolyzed soy protein, Hydrolyzed wheat protein, Hydrolyzed corn protein, 4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene, Aspalathus linearis leaf extract, Camellia sinensis extract, Cassia angustifolia extract, Chamomilla recutita extract, Humulus lupulus extract, Melissa officinalis extract, Panax ginseng extract, Rosmarinus officinalis extract. Colour & care activator: Aqua, Hydrogen peroxide, Ceteth-2, Stereth-20, Ceteareth-6, Cetearyl alcohol, Lauryl pyrrolidone, Tetrasodium etidronate, Salicylic acid, Phosphoric acid, EDTA. Colour fix conditioner: Aqua, Cetearyl alcohol, Paraffinum liquidum, Cetrimonium chloride, Glycerin, SOdium benzoate, Lactic acid, Parfum, Pplyquaternium-4, Oleyl erucate, Panthenol, Dimethylparamidopropyl laurdimonium tosylate, POlysorbate 20, Linoleic acid, Hydroxypropyltrimonium corn/wheat/soy amino acids, Melissa officinalis extract, Rosmarinus officinali extract, Panax ginseng extract, Aspalathus linearis leaf extract, Humulus lupulus extract, Camellia sinensis extract, Cassia angustifolia extract, Chamomilla recutita extract.
Gebruik
Gebruik colour & care op ongewassen, droog haar. Draag geschikte handschoenen. Wanneer u veel styling producten gebruikt, is het raadzaam eerst uw haar te wassen en goed te drogen.
1. Voorzorgsmaatregelen.
- Controleer kleurnaam en kleurnummer van tube en verpakking.
- Voer 48 uur van tevoren een gevoeligheidstest uit.
- Buiten bereik van kinderen houden.
2. Voorbereiding
Van tevoren klaarleggen:
- Oude/donkere handdoek of kapmantel ter bescherming van de kleding tijdens het mengen en kleuren.
- Een kam met grove tanden (geen metaal).
- Een klokje.
- De inhoud uit de verpakking.
3. Mengen
Leg de kapmantel of de handdoek oom uw schouders en trek de bijgeleverde handschoenen aan.
- Haal de dop van de tube met de colour cream. Leeg de gehele inhoud van de tube in de opbrengflacon.
- Sluit de flacon af. Deze goed schudden totdat u een gelijkmatig mengsel krijgt.
- Breek het tipje dan onmiddellijk van de dop van de flacon af en pas het product direct toe. Niet in een tochtige ruimte werken.
- Voorkom morsen! Vlekken van de kleuring op vloerbedekking etc. kunnen niet worden verwijderd.
4. Toepassingsmogelijkheden.
De verpakking bevat voldoende voor een complete kleurbehandeling van schouderlang haar. Bij schouderlang tot lang haar en bij dik haar zijn twee of meerdere verpakkingen nodig. Maak een verpakking tegelijk aan. Breng de inhoud van de eerste verpakking aan op het haar bovenop uw hoofd en aan de achterzijde. Maak daarna de tweede verpakking aan en kleur hiermee het haar aan de zijkanten, langs uw gezicht en de haarpunten.
a. Toepassing op niet gekleurd haar.
Met behulp van de opbrengflacon brengt u het mengsel aan op ongewassen, droog haar. Breng het mengsel lok voor lok aan, vanaf de haarinplant naar de punten toe. Het mengsel daarna met de kam gelijkmatig verdelen over het haar en goed inmasseren. Het haar niet afdekken.
B. Toepassing als vervolgbehandeling van reeds gekleurd haar.
Indien uw haar eerder gekleurd is (niet donkerder gekleurd dan de nu op te brengen kleur) en een uitgroei heeft of indien uw haarpunten donkerder of poreus zijn, wordt geadviseerd het mengsel eerst alleen op de haarinplant aan te bregen. U gebruik hiervoor ca. 2/3 van het mengsel en u masseert het licht in op ongewassen, droog haar (het flesje niet afsluiten). Na 20 minuten inwerktijd (bij lightblond 8 na 30-40 minuten) verdeelt u de rest van de vloeistof over de haarlengten en - punten. Wederom licht inmasseren en met de kam verdelen. Het haar niet afdekken. Nog 5-10 minuten laten inwerken en uitspoelen.
5. Inwerktijd.
- 30 minuten laten inwerken.
- Voor een betere dekking op dik, stug of grijs haar kan de inwerktijd met 5-10 minuten worden verlengd.
- Voor de kleur light blond kan een inwerktijd tot maximaal 45 minuten worden gehanteerd.
6. Uitspoelen en nabehandeling.
Na de inwerktijd met lauw water op het haar aanbrengen en licht masseren.Daarna zorgvuldig en overvloedig uitspoelen tot het water helder is Na behandelen met de bijgesloten colour-fix conditioner. M
Bewaaradvies
Het verkregen mengsel in geen geval bewaren en buiten bereik van kinderen houden.
Waarschuwingen
Haarkleurstoffen kunnen ernstige allergische reacties veroorzaken.
Dit product is niet bestemd voor gebruik bij personen jonger dan 16 jaar.
Tijdelijke tatoeages met zwarte henna kunnen leiden tot een verhoogd risico op een allergische reactie.
Kleur uw haar niet als:
U last heeft van uitslag in het gezicht of van een gevoelige, geïrriteerde of beschadigde hoofdhuid.
U eerder een reactie na een haarkleuring heeft gehad.
U in het verleden een reactie heeft gehad na een tijdelijke tatoeage met zwarte henna.
Bevat genyleendiaminen (tolueendiaminen), resorcinol en waterstofperoxide.
Gevoeligheidstest 48 uur van tevoren uitvoeren.
Niet gebruiken voor het verven van winpers of wenkbrauwen.
Na het aanbrengen het haar goed spoelen.
Contact met ogen vermijden.
Geschikte handschoenen dragen.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Comprehensive, invaluable resource
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This set is just massive. There is so much depth and insight, I don't know that I'll ever get to it all. One could literally read these volumes cover to cover because they're simply interesting and thought provoking. That said, I think it's best taken in small doses, perhaps focusing on single verses as they arise in daily life or in bible study. The physical quality of the volumes is top notch as well. This set would work well in a private library but could be equally appropriate for a church library. Absolutely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Valued study tool
Format: Hardcover
This resource is phenomenal. I’ve been including this commentary set in my resources to teach through the minor prophets, and I find myself really appreciating its solid, accurate, grace-filled contents.
This includes the ESV text, supporting timelines, graphics, and charts, and expansive commentary supporting the text. This set will be a valued study tool for years to come.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Imposing and Exceptional Quality
Format: Hardcover
The content and quality of the ESV commentary series matches that of their study Bibles. Broadly reformed, but not dogmatic on a particular angle, clear and concise, great for study. This commentary set isn't so much for digging deep in the weeds as it is for learning a solid Biblical Theology-based framework of the Bible. It's simpler than some, but much more in-depth than the ESV Study Bible, making it the next step for learning.
The full set is imposing - lovely big, black hardbacks which look phenomenal on a bookshelf. Do I think this is practical for everybody? No, it might not be. You can get this kind of thing in digital form in one way or another these days (please understand that I don't like to go quite that digital, and I haven't researched what all is available). If you're pressed for living space, you might not want these. I live with a spouse in a midsize one-bedroom apartment. Fortunately, we already knew we wanted to prioritize some of our space for physical books, because we find pleasure in them. I will have to clear off some of my existing bookshelf space and relegate some books to a box in storage (consider that this set takes up all the space in a fairly large packing box, and you'll know how much you need). But it's worth it for me.
I also see the acquisition of this box set as a bit of a prompt to take back up more in-depth study of the Scripture, which too often gets sidetracked by the rest of life getting in the way. Having the physical books are already something of a commitment. If all I had were ebooks or an app, I would likely never utilize them the same way.
Last notes: these were packed very well. Each volume is shrink-wrapped in cellophane and none of the corners were damaged. They did a good job with that. Lastly, the price for these is fairly high. I acknowledge that. I think theological books are about on the same level, usually, however. So I did not see the need to deduct a star.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2025
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint.
The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well.
Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here).
Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to.
Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits.
Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job.
Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus.
The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus.
Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it).
My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps.
Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile.
Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312).
On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking.
Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism.
On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors.
I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16).
I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer.
It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009