Pay in installments of $17.54 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Oct 8 - Oct 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
nu1010 m1 c3 fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0167370670030 NU1010 M1 C3 Auendurchmesser: 80 mm Gewicht: 310 Gramm Herstellungsland: Auf Anfrage Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 80,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "17300. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 16,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 16,00 C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal ECLASS number 23 05 09 01 ECLASS2 number 23 05 09 01 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 31 Innenmae:
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0167370670030 NU1010-M1-C3 |
| Außendurchmesser: 80 mm |
| Gewicht: 310 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Auf Anfrage |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 80,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "17300.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 16,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 16,00 |
| C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.31 |
| Innenmaße: mm 50,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C3 Innenluft (größer als Cn) |
| M1 Solid Brass Cage, Two Piece, Roller Guided |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 42500 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 41500 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "7400.0000" |
| XL X-Life |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Good quality, runs small through middle
Color: Nave Blue, Size: 3X-Large
Good looking shirt and much thicker and sturdier than I expected. Run small in gut though. I'm a 3X in everything but had to get 4X in this.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great overshirt, but heavier than you might expect.
Great fit. Good quality, heavy cotton. I bought it as a substitute for a light jacket… to maybe wear open with a t-shirt. It’s pretty heavy… almost like denim… which was what I wanted. But it’s heavier than what I would wear as a “shirt”. The price was great, so I’d buy it again since it comes in a variety of colors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 21, 2025
★★★★★ 1
100% polyester is awful!
Color: Olive Green, Size: Large
As others have pointed out, this used to be 100% cotton and it was great. Sturdy and comfortable, nice worn-in look. Now it’s 100% polyester and it’s terrible. Feels cheap, looks cheap and shiny. Please bring back the cotton shirts.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Machine Washable but NOT Machine Dryable!
Seems well made and fits me well (6'2", 196 lb). I like the feel and color. However, contrary to lots of the reviews saying the shirt the received, mine was 100% Polyester. The instructions say machine washable. But upon receiving the item, its label says "do not tumble dry." I intended it for a two week+ cruise where washing it and quick drying will be essential. Drip drying would be very inconvenient.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Thicker shirt, not jacket or shacket.
Color: Olive Green, Size: Small
It's not a jacket or a shacket-- too thin for that. But it is a thicker shirt, very soft, and could be worn as business/dress or casual. We didn't keep it, because it wasn't what we were looking for, but it's a nice shirt. Bigger than we were hoping for a 10-year-old boy (who is very tall for his age).
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 28, 2025