SKU: 59908421114

Mapei Kerapoxy Easy Design 3 kg kleur 141 (caramel)

Sale price$54.90 Regular price$61.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $15.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 25 - Aug 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Mapei Kerapoxy Easy Design 3 kg kleur 141 (caramel)Levertijd: Producten voor 10: 00 uur besteld, binnen 2 werkdagen in huis. Producten na 10: 00 uur besteld, binnen 3 werkdagen in huis. TOEPASSING Het binnens en buitenshuis decoratief afvoegen van vloer en wandbekledingen, in het bijzonder glasmozaek. Ook geschikt voor zuurbestendige verlijming op alle in de bouw gangbare ondergronden. Met Kerapoxy Design kunt u vloeren, wanden werkbladen etc. creren die voldoen aan het HACCPsysteem en de eisen van EG

Levertijd: Producten voor 10:00 uur besteld, binnen 2 werkdagen in huis. Producten na 10:00 uur besteld, binnen 3 werkdagen in huis.

TOEPASSING

Het binnens- en buitenshuis decoratief afvoegen van vloer- en wandbekledingen, in het bijzonder glasmozaïek. Ook geschikt voor zuurbestendige verlijming op alle in de bouw gangbare ondergronden. Met Kerapoxy Design kunt u vloeren, wanden werkbladen etc. creëren die voldoen aan het HACCPsysteem en de eisen van EG-Verordening No. 852/2004 met betrekking tot hygiene en levensmiddelen.

Bereiden van het mengsel

Giet de verharder (component B) in de houder van component A en meng het geheel goed door tot een homogeen mengsel is verkregen. Gebruik bij voorkeur een langzaam draaiende elektrische menger. De menging geschiedt dan op juiste wijze en zo wordt voorkomen dat de massa te warm wordt, met een verkorte verwerkingstijd tot gevolg. Indien nodig, voeg MapeGlitter toe zodra het mengsel is gemixd, in een verhouding van 10% op gewicht. Gebruik het mengsel binnen 45 minuten na de bereiding. Aanbrengen Breng Kerapoxy Design aan met een speciale MAPEI voegbord en zorg ervoor de de voegen tot aan de bodem zijn gevuld. Verwijder overtollig materiaal door met de zijkant van het voegbord diagonaal over de tegelvoegen heen te gaan.

Afwerken

De afgevoegde tegels moeten moeten worden gereinigd als het product nog vers is. Maak het afgevoegde oppervlak goed nat met een Scotch-Brite®-spons of MAPEI tegelvoeg schoonmaak kit. Pas er daarbij voor op dat het voegmiddel niet uit de voegen wordt verwijderd. Tegels/mozaiek kunnen ook worden gereinigd met dezelfde spons, maar deze zal meer verzadigd moeten zijn met water. Vloeibare resten kunnen worden verwijderd met een harde spons van cellulose (bijvoorbeeld de spons van MAPEI), die moet worden vervangen als die te vol zit met hars en bij de laatste schoonmaak van de voegen. Het is erg belangrijk dat na de afwerking geen resten Kerapoxy Design op de tegeloppervlakken achterblijven. Is dit product eenmaal hard, dan kan het namelijk zeer moeilijk worden verwijderd: tijdens het reinigen moet de spons daarom veelvuldig met schoon water worden uitgespoeld. Bij zeer grote vloeroppervlakken kan de afwerking plaatsvinden met een poetsmachine met speciale viltschuurschijven, zoals Scotch-Brite®. De achterblijvende vloeistof kan met een rubberen vloertrekker worden verwijderd. Kerapoxy Cleaner (speciaal reinigingsmiddel voor epoxy voegen) kan ook worden gebruikt voor de laatste schoonmaakcyclys en voor het verwijderen van dunne restjes voegmiddel tot enkele uren na applicatie. In dit geval, moet het product langer inwerken (minstens 15-20 minuten). Het werking van Kerapoxy Cleaner is afhankelijk van de hoeveelheid achtergebleven hars en de hoeveelheid tijd na applicatie. Reinigen moet worden uitgevoerd zolang het product “vers” is, zoals hierboven beschreven.

AANBRENGEN ALS LIJM

Nadat de twee componenten zijn gemengd op de hiervoor beschreven wijze, de lijm op de ondergrond aanbrengen met een geschikte getande lijmkam. Druk de tegels/ mozaiek in het lijmbed om te zorgen dat de lijm goed wordt overgebracht. Als de binding is voltooid, is de hechting uiterst sterk en bestand tegen chemische stoen. Dankzij de specifieke consistentie van het product kan direct na de verlijming van de tegels, ook verticaal, met het afvoegen worden begonnen. Hierdoor kan de totale aanbrengtijd aanzienlijk worden gereduceerd.

VERBRUIK

Het verbruik van Kerapoxy Design hangt af van de voegafmetingen en het tegelformaat. Voor het afvoegen van mozaïek (formaat 2x2 cm) bedraagt het verbruik circa 1,4 kg/m². Gebruikt als lijm varieert het verbruik van Kerapoxy Design tussen 2-4 kg/m². De tabel geeft het verbruik in kg/m² aan. Het verbruik van MapeGlitter hangt af van het gewenste esthetische eect en bedraagt maximaal 10% van het gewicht van Kerapoxy Design.

VERPAKKING

Kerapoxy Design wordt in de nauwkeurig voorgedoseerde mengverhouding geleverd in emmers die naast component A ook de fles met component B bevatten. Deze componenten moeten op het moment van gebruik met elkaar worden gemengd. Het product wordt geleverd in 3 kg units. MapeGlitter is verkrijgbaar in zakjes van 100 g.

KLEUREN

Kerapoxy Design is leverbaar in 32 kleuren.

HOUDBAARHEID

Kerapoxy Design kan 24 maanden in de originele verpakking, op een droge plaats worden bewaard.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 59908421114

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Justin G
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
The finest hour of William Friedkin
William Friedkin was undoubtedly one of the 1970s greatest and most influential directors. He only made 3 pictures during the decade, but all are landmark films. The first was The French Connection (1971), the film that won him his best director Oscar & the film won best picture. His next film, The Exorcist (1973) is probably his most famous/infamous & and it’s the only movie that’s still a truly terrifying experience, something to endure as much as to watch almost lol. Sorcerer (1977) was his 3rd and final film of the decade, and in spite of or perhaps even because of how it was a largely forgotten film for so long (after seeing it on cable nearly 30 years ago, it was a movie I simply could not track down until the release of this Blu-Ray) I really think in so many ways it ranks right along aside his first two 70s classics, and perhaps even surpasses those films in terms of pure audacity. The rope bridge scene is as intense as a set piece gets and is worth the price of admission all on its own, but the film as a whole is a clinic in lean, economical filmmaking. And the score by Tangerine Dream kicks serious a**. It might be because of his 70s trifecta Sorcerer is the only one that is still almost sort of like a “new film” too me, as I’ve only watched it maybe 3-4 times and have seen the other 2 dozens of times, but for my money Sorcerer is master filmmaker William Friedkin at the absolute peak of his powers. MD2020 gives “Sorcerer” 5 out of 5 ⭐️s and says it’s a flawless action film and Friedkins best work.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2024
C
Verified Purchase
cookieman108
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 4
A stylish, intimate remake of a French Classic
William Friedkin (The French Connection) brings us exotic locations and gripping story in Sorcerer, a remake of Henri-Georges Clouzot's 1953 thriller Wages of Fear. The first hour of this movie seems to be comprised of random events involving four individuals that have absolutely nothing to do with each other. The only commonality is that they are all men of dubious character. Probably the most recognizable actor in this film is Roy Schieder, who plays a low level New York gangster participate in a robbery that goes bad, and forces him to flee the country due to the fact he managed to step on some pretty well connected toes. The second man, a French businessman, escapes from the threat of prosecution due to some shady business dealings. The third man, a Middle Eastern terrorist flees his captors after being caught participating in a bombing, and the fourth man is a shady assassin type apparently on the run from repercussion from his last hit. The key is all four men end up in a South American rat-infested stink hole of a town called Vera Cruz. After awhile, they find their sanctuary has become more of a prison and all begin a desperate search for a way out, but that involves money, a commodity that's in short supply, with the only work available in the area is provided by an oil company that runs a well and is building a pipeline for the bubbling crude. Dangerous work, and the pay is so low that it would take years to earn enough to leave. Salvation for the men comes in a catastrophic disaster, an explosion damaging the well and causing the oil to burn. The only way to close the well proper for repairs is to blow it up, and the only explosives available are 200 miles away. Turns out the explosives, sticks of nitro, haven't been tended very well, and, in turn, are highly unstable. The company decides to hire four men to drive two trucks to carry the dangerous materials through 200 miles of dangerous jungle, including prehistoric rope and wood bridges, treacherous mountain passes, deadly bandits and swampy roads laden with fallen trees. The suicide mission draws the four men, as the money would allow them to escape the oppressive town. The most intense scenes for me involved the men trying to traverse a rickety, rotting wooden rope suspension bridge over a raging river during a heavy rainstorm. There were times when the truck on the bridge was at such an angle, I thought it would flip right off. And all the actors performed most all their own stunts, adding to the realism of the movie. Do they make it? See the movie and find out. I especially liked the very end. A very nice touch that reminded me of an ending of a certain Alfred Hitchcock movie. Which one? I won't say, as it would give it away. The movie runs just under two hours, and I would highly recommend it to anyone. Friedkin and the actors do a wonderful job in developing tensions between the characters and the environment and the between the characters themselves. The pacing is a bit slow, but it's deliberate, cranking the suspense up, notch by grueling notch. There are sparse special features, including pretty thorough productions notes and a trailer. If you enjoy thrilling adventure, you will most likely like this movie. I would have happily given this movie five stars but it is only available in the full screen format. Something I didn't understand is the title for the movie. I wasn't able to figure out what it had to do with the movie.... Cookieman108
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2003
T
Verified Purchase
Todd7
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Forgotten Classic
Sorcerer (1977) is, for the most part, a forgotten classic. First the forgotten: this film got kicked around by moviegoers when first released, probably because the title is misleading (nothing to do with fantasy), and they probably weren't in the mood for this film due to the sudden stratospheric success of another film that debuted at the same time (Star Wars). With Star Wars cementing the advent of the summer blockbuster, suddenly moviegoers wanted stuff more on the surface and eye candy for good measure. As a result, Sorcerer never got its footing, and was a major box office failure. If this film had debuted just a few years earlier, it would've done well, because it would've fit in with the other films of the time. The truth is that Sorcerer is an adaptation (not a remake) of The Wages of Fear from 1953. Now the classic: Sorcerer has since generated the respect it deserves, and is one of the best films of the 1970's. This film has it all: action, suspense, breathtaking and iconic scenes (the bridge scene being one), organic acting and a sort of 'raw' feel in terms of a lot of the settings; dwellings are dilapidated, and the machinery rusty. Even the actors are dirty, sweaty, and have visible wounds throughout the film. I particularly like the restraint on the dialogue, as Friedkin chooses to tell the story more in a visual sense. I also like the uniqueness of the characters being kept at a distance from the audience; this makes them sort of mysterious and seems to work in this film. This film was a very ambitious project, one that has been rewarded with the passage of time (thankfully). The care that went into many scenes and accompanying special effects are obvious, and first rate. Overall, Sorcerer is a must-see. This blu ray has excellent picture and sound quality, so it was worth the wait in that regard. One last thing: it's extremely rare for a blu ray disc to not include any special features; in the case of Sorcerer, it's unfortunately true. Perhaps this fact tells us just how much of a beating this film took over the years. I guess we should feel grateful that it has even made it onto blu ray.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2017
G
Verified Purchase
glenn
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Sorcerer (1977) (BD)
This is a different version, which can happen after the initial film with different editing and ending. I don't remember the political emphasis at all, and the ending of the other version was with Roy Scheider getting through the rough parts with his eyes glowing as he drove the truck alone, a real Sorcerer, after performing the miracle. This version continues after the completion to another ending altogether. I think both are great films, but each with a separate focus. This was all done without CGI which seems impossible. The scenes are still amazing and the camera work and editing top-notch.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Dylan
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 3
Good but not Wages of Fear
The much maligned Sorcerer is in fact a good well crafted thriller that if seen without refrence to the Original Wages of Fear would have faired far better at the hands of the critics. That's not to say the film is perfect. The opening scenes that fill the viewer in on the charecters back stories, are pointless and actually work against the tension that is built up later in the film. Knowing exactly why the characters are desperate makes their reasons for taking on the deadly task seem a bit lame and looses the exestential angst that creates such a hopeless atmosphere. Once in South America the oppresive nature of their stay in the village is also diminshed by knowing too much about them. Having said all that there is still an air of desperation and mounting frustration, it's just not as clausterphobic as it could have been. Once the journey begins the tension is turned on, the only problem is that by knowing the original so well there is not quite the frisson of that classic. This is an unfortunate by-product of re-making any well respected film. Friedkin however has a fair go and if this is the film you see first you will wonder why it was so slated on original release. The film moves at a well constructed pace that is aided by a cracking score from Tangerine Dream. The cast perform well and Roy Scheider is reasonably well cast but does not deliver the subtly nuanced performance he is capable of, for this you need to look towards (obviously) Jaws and to a lesser extent the minor role he playes in Naked Lunch. All in all a good film, though not great, and as the review starts by saying, not Wages Of Fear, but it deserves a better reputation than it so unfortunatly has and will be a good addition to anyones collection of interesting 70's films (the best decade for American Filmaking by a long long way).
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2005

recommand products