Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
b7013 c t p4s ul fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0167275410000 7013CDGA P4A Auendurchmesser: 100 mm Gewicht: 420 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 100,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 18,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 18,00 C 15 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 42
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0167275410000 7013CDGA/P4A |
| Außendurchmesser: 100 mm |
| Gewicht: 420 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 100,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 18,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 18,00 |
| C 15° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.42 |
| Innenmaße: mm 65,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 41500 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 25500 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 660 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 5.068 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 20,1 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 72 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 66,7 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 164 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 25.500 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 41.500 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 2.700 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 100 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 41.500 N |
| E tk max 79,5 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 75,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 79,5 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 75,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 2.700 N |
| F V H 1.417 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 214 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 5.068 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 660 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 79,5 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 75,9 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1,1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 25.500 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 214 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 1.417 N |
| a 20,1 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 164 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 66,7 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 72 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 420,24 g Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 428 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Soft and convenient, but slightly thin
I bought these disposable napkins for family dinners and small gatherings, and overall they’ve been very useful. They’re soft enough to feel comfortable while still absorbing spills and messes fairly well. I also like that the size is practical for everyday meals and snacks, and the stack fits neatly on the table without taking up much space. The napkins separate easily too, which is convenient when guests are around. However, they are a little thinner than I expected, so sometimes I end up using two for bigger spills. Still, they work well for regular use and are a convenient option to keep around the kitchen and dining area.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Basic everyday napkins but very thin
These are about as basic as paper napkins get. They work fine for everyday meals and quick cleanup, but they are definitely on the thinner side.
You usually end up needing more than one for messier foods or larger spills because they don’t feel especially absorbent or heavy-duty.
That said, the large count is convenient for everyday household use, cookouts, lunch packing, or casual gatherings where you go through napkins quickly.
Overall they’re functional budget napkins, just nothing particularly thick or special.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good purchase
Good price, not bad quality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great Quality for the Price
Size: 100 Count (Pack of 1)
Love these paper plates. They’re sturdy, microwave-safe, and hold up well without getting soggy or folding easily. Great for everyday use and cleanup is super convenient. Good value for the price and reliable for meals and snacks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice and sturdy!
Size: 300 Count
This was our first time to try the Amazon Basics Everyday Plates. I typically purchase paper plates in bulk from a big box club store. These are just as good, if not better! They are thick and sturdy, and hold up well. The price point it also better!
My only negative is the design on the plate isn’t the most appealing. I think it’d be better if the design was limited to just being on the edge, and not across the entire plate.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026