SKU: 73973949601

b7032 e t p4s ul fag

Sale price$461.86 Regular price$513.18
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

b7032 e t p4s ul fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0191530580000 7032ACDGA P4A Gewicht: 5100 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Innendurchmesser: 160 mm Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 240,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 38,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 38,00 E 25 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 4.

Technische Basisdaten

Hersteller: FAG
Synonym: 0191530580000 7032ACDGA/P4A
Gewicht: 5100 Gramm
Herstellungsland: Deutschland
Innendurchmesser: 160 mm
Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung
Spannung: geringe Spannung
Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090


Erweiterte technische Daten

Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 240,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 38,00
Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 38,00
E 25° Contact Angle
ECLASS number 23-05-08-03
ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03
Einzelgewicht in (kg): 4.99
Innenmaße: mm 160,00
P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9
Paarung G – Universelle Paarung
Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4)
Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 182000
Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 138000
T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C
UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload
Abhebekraft leicht: 4.988 N
Abhebekraft schwer: 35.587 N
Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 65,6 mm
Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12
Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 174 mm
Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 385 N/µm
Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 806 N/µm
Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C
Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C
C 0r 138.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial
C r 182.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial
C ur 10.400 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial
Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 182.000 N
E tk max 193,4 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis
E tk min 184,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis
E tk1 max 193,4 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis
E tk1 min 184,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis
Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 10.400 N
F V H 11.519 N Vorspannkraft schwer
F V L 1.715 N Vorspannkraft leicht
K aE H 35.587 N Abhebekraft schwer
K aE L 4.988 N Abhebekraft leicht
Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 193,4 mm
Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm
Maximaler Freistichradius: 2,1 mm
Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 184,7 mm
Minimaler Kantenabstand: 2,1 mm
Statische Tragzahl, radial: 138.000 N
T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max.
T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min.
Vorspannkraft leicht: 1.715 N
Vorspannkraft schwer: 11.519 N
a 65,6 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze
c a H 806 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer
c a L 385 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht
d =a 174 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter
d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung
r 1 min 2,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
r a max 2,1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r a1 max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius
r min 2,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand
≈m 4,945 kg Einzelgewicht
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 73973949601

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 1446 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
P
Verified Purchase
Philip Giuliano
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Great value
I recently had to replace the starter on my 2001 325i E46 with about 150k miles. While I had the intake off, I figured it would be a good time to replace the CCV because I was unsure if it had ever been done. My old CCV literally fell apart as I removed it, so I'm glad I replaced it. The new parts were a little tough to put together, but overall came together well enough. A lot can be forgiven for the price. I would recommend assembling the system before installing in your vehicle to get a good sense of how it all goes together and to hopefully loosen up the fittings just a tad before installation. 50skid on youtube has a great DIY for doing this job. I only finished this job yesterday, but my car has been running great. I can't yet confirm, but this may have solved my running lean problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2023
C
Verified Purchase
Craig Randall
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 3
Cheap plastic parts -- good fit
They are what they are: Cheap plastic parts. They fit, but long-term durability will be a challenge. Probably will buy from FCP Euro going forward (and just did for a fuel line replacement).
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024
R
Verified Purchase
ruben rodriguez
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
2001 325i
Great quality fits perfect durable. no more leaks works great. Great price.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2024
F
Verified Purchase
Farrin Johnson
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 1
Does not connect
First the hoses do not connect together causing all kinds of vacuum leaks. There is no rifling in the diaphragm so oil leaks back up. Cheap piece of plastic
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2022
D
Verified Purchase
Dar ER
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Amazon size charts need help
Size: Small, Color: Dark Denim
The dress is sharp. Well made. The Amazon size guide and AI size helper not so great. It was suggested to me to order a size large. Well I knew that was wrong so I went with the medium due to size chart. Still way too big. Had to return the medium and order a small . That also was too big and now had to order an XS . What a hassle. Please correct the size chart. Would very much appreciate the accessories listed that the model is wearing such as who’s boots she is wearing
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 16, 2026

recommand products