Pay in installments of $119.62 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
tapered baguette blue gemstone earrings: . , , . Note: The Listed Earrings Is Made With Only 14K White Gold, And Back Type Is Screw Back Gemstone Details Shape Round Cut Dimension 3. 00 MM ( 0. 10 MM) Carat Weight 0. 20 TCW ( 0. 10 CT) Color Blue Type Semi Precious Gemstone Diamond Details Shape Tapered Baguette Cut Dimension 3. 00*2. 00*1. 00 MM ( 0. 10 MM) Carat Weight 1. 50 TCW ( 0. 10 CT) Color Clarity EF_VS Type Lab Grown Diamond Earrings Details Back Type Screw Back Metal Purity 14KT
|| 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞: 𝐋𝐚𝐛-𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐣𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐓𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐟-𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐒𝐀. 𝐇𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫, 𝐢𝐟 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐬 𝐝𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐱𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐒𝐀 𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. ||
|| Note: The Listed Earrings Is Made With Only 14K White Gold, And Back Type Is Screw Back ||
Gemstone Details
| Shape | Round Cut |
| Dimension | 3.00 MM (± 0.10 MM) |
| Carat Weight | 0.20 TCW (± 0.10 CT) |
| Color | Blue |
| Type | Semi -Precious Gemstone |
Diamond Details
| Shape | Tapered Baguette Cut |
| Dimension | 3.00*2.00*1.00 MM (± 0.10 MM) |
| Carat Weight | 1.50 TCW (± 0.10 CT) |
| Color/Clarity | EF_VS |
| Type | Lab Grown Diamond |
Earrings Details
| Back Type |
Screw Back |
| Metal Purity |
14KT |
| Metal Tone |
White Gold |
| Stamp/Hallmark | Yes |
| Jewelry Certificate | Ouros Brand Authentic Jewelry Certificate - Contact Us for Your Certificate |
𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 & 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐓𝐨 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐎𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬
✤ The listed Earrings are made with only 14K White gold and the back type is Screw back, if you want some modifications then feel free to contact us.
✤ All the specifications are already mentioned in the listing; Hence, make sure to double-check before placing the order.
✤ This will not be eligible for a refund or for order cancellation.
✤ There will be no exchange for this category, once the order is placed as these Earrings are specially made for ready-to-ship.
✤ I'll be able to ship out the item, within 48-72 hours of the order being placed, so you'll be receiving the item quickly.
✤ The Earrings are made up of pure lab-grown diamonds. For authenticity will provide a diamond tester video before dispatch for your jewelry.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written.
Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier.
My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author.
Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing.
And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot...
In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026
recommand products
Personalized sconce, garden lantern, sconce, lantern, musician, violin, music gift, garden decor, garden sculpture, yard lantern,wall sconce
330.00
Putco 03-15 Chevrolet Silv - Towing Mirrors (w/o Turn Signals or Camera Sensors) Mirror Covers
137.47
Sterling Silver Handbag Charm with Multi Tone Crystal Embellishments
39.99
14k Rose Gold Polished Hoop Earrings (3x25mm)
196.00
Champagne Gold Ruhaani
1099.50