Pay in installments of $15.52 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 6 - Aug 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
KYB Shocks & Struts Excel-G Front & Rear FORD Mustang Mustang II 1974 FORD Pinto 1971-80 FORD ThundeRide Comfort may be important, but restoring a vehicles Ride Control, stability, stopping, lane change responsiveness and handling is critical. KYB Excel G Shocks and Struts are designed for the most important performance purpose: Restoring the vehicles original capabilities. KYB is a world leading supplier of shocks and struts to new vehicle manufacturers and the Excel G is made on the very same KYB OE assembly lines, uses the same OE quality
Ride Comfort may be important, but restoring a vehicles Ride Control, stability, stopping, lane change responsiveness and handling is critical. KYB Excel-G Shocks and Struts are designed for the most important performance purpose: Restoring the vehicles original capabilities. KYB is a world leading supplier of shocks and struts to new vehicle manufacturers and the Excel-G is made on the very same KYB OE assembly lines, uses the same OE quality components and is calibrated to restore original, designed performance, not change it. That has earned Excel-G the classification: OEA (Original Equipment for the Aftermarket). The KYB Excel-G is a nitrogen gas-charged, twin-tube design that includes every quality component that our global OEM products include and it is the preferred choice by professional technicians.This Part Fits:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | Ford | Mustang II | 2+2 |
| 1974 | Ford | Mustang II | Base |
| 1974 | Ford | Mustang II | Ghia |
| 1974 | Ford | Mustang II | Mach 1 |
| 1971-1980 | Ford | Pinto | Base |
| 1976-1980 | Ford | Pinto | Pony |
| 1976-1980 | Ford | Pinto | Squire |
| 1955-1957 | Ford | Thunderbird | Base |
| 1975,1977-1980 | Mercury | Bobcat | Base |
| 1976 | Mercury | Bobcat | MPG Runabout |
| 1976-1980 | Mercury | Bobcat | Runabout |
| 1976 | Mercury | Bobcat | S Runabout |
| 1976-1980 | Mercury | Bobcat | Villager |
| 1961-1968 | Volvo | 122 | Base |
| 1961-1968 | Volvo | 122 | S |
| 1961-1968 | Volvo | 1800 | Base |
| 1969-1973 | Volvo | 1800 | E |
| 1972-1973 | Volvo | 1800 | ES |
| 1964-1969 | Volvo | 1800 | S |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 22 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Pretty good wipes
These wipes are great and I love that each pack has it's own lid. These are medium thickness (not as thick as Huggies, but not as thin as some store brands) and do a good job cleaning my baby's behind. We typically need 1-2 wipes for #2's depending on how far up her back it travels lol. I got these at a great price and am very happy with them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Sturdy and Effective
The inside of a diaper bag is not a gentle place, so anything I put in there needs to be sturdy enough to handle the bumping, shoving, and crushing. The pouches are not rigid, so they can fold, but are thick enough not to tear. The lid opens and closes smoothly and I have not had any of them wear out or stop staying closed before the wipes run out.
The wipes have a pleasant scent and feel clean. The wipes are the right thickness for most jobs, but are not what I would call 'thick' wipes nor are they 'thin'. The oils and chemicals used are gentle enough for older babies while still getting them clean, but I would recommend something more gentle for newborns.
The four pack was a great value (12 pouches total) and I would recommend it to any fellow parents of infants or toddlers.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Loyal to pampers
Size: 504 Count (Pack of 1)
We are big fans of pampers! I love being able to buy them on Amazon at a lower price. I love the ease of the individual packaging as well as the fact that there is not disgusting smell to these wipes. Even the 'non scented' wipes tend to have an odd smell with other brands. These are very soft and do not feel as if they would irritate babies bottoms.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2016
★★★★★ 5
Love these wipes! Great price!
Size: 504 Count (Pack of 1)
I love pampers for my son! We love the scent and ability to clean. I'm not sure why some customers gave these lower stars because they don't have individual dispensers. We use these to refill ours (I believe that's what they're for). If you read the description - this product never claimed to have them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2017
★★★★★ 4
Really soft yet tears easily
Size: 504 Count (Pack of 1)
These wipes lasted awhile. They had a good scent to them and cleaned very well. The only thing that drove me crazy was when getting the wipes out of the package, they tore a lot. I would end up with pieces of a sheet and I ended up using more that necessary because of this.
I would still buy these if they were on sale. I have 3 children as well as babysit for parents that don't bring me diapers and wipes. I coupon for diapers and wipes and normally quality is pretty consistent in comparison. These wipes are much softer than one particular brand yet the other brand has a thick, cloth-like wipe that rarely tears. I would still recommend them and I will still buy when the price is right.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2016