SKU: 99340164343

Cometic Ford Big Block 4.40in Bore .075 Compressed Thickness MLS Head Gasket

Sale price$145.75 Regular price$161.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $40.49 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Cometic Ford Big Block 4.40in Bore .075 Compressed Thickness MLS Head GasketComprised of multiple embossed layers of stainless steel with the outer layers utilizing a Viton rubber coating. Compressed operating thickness is 0. 075". Cometic MLS (Multi Layer Steel) Head Gaskets provide maximum sealing performance for todays high output engines and require no sealants. MLS gaskets are ideal for both aluminum heads to aluminum blocks and aluminum heads to cast iron blocks. They can withstand the shearing force created by the two

Comprised of multiple embossed layers of stainless steel with the outer layers utilizing a Viton rubber coating. Compressed operating thickness is 0.075". Cometic MLS (Multi-Layer Steel) Head Gaskets provide maximum sealing performance for todays high output engines and require no sealants. MLS gaskets are ideal for both aluminum heads to aluminum blocks and aluminum heads to cast iron blocks. They can withstand the shearing force created by the two materials. MLS gaskets have increased strength because they are comprised of multiple layers of stainless steel; which also creates the ability to rebound and resist corrosion. The outer layers are embossed and coated on both sides with Viton (a flour elastomer rubber based material that is heat resistant to 250 C/ 482 F). Viton is designed to meet the demands of a variety of harsh sealing environments, load conditions, and surface finishes. The center or shim layer is uncoated stainless steel, which can be varied to accommodate multiple thickness requirements.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1969-1974 Ford Country Sedan Base
1969-1974 Ford Country Squire Base
1969-1972 Ford Custom Base
1969-1976 Ford Custom 500 Base
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Base
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Chateau
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Custom
1978 Ford E-100 Econoline Northland
1975-1980 Ford E-250 Econoline Base
1975-1980 Ford E-250 Econoline Chateau
1975-1980 Ford E-250 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-250 Econoline Northland
1975-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1975-1982 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1975-1983,1987-1991 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1991 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1984-1991 Ford E-250 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1975-1982,1984-1986,1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Base
1975-1982 Ford E-350 Econoline Chateau
1975-1983,1987-1991 Ford E-350 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-350 Econoline Northland
1983-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline XL
1977-1982,1984-1986 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1977-1982,1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau HD
1977-1983,1987-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1992-1993 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Custom HD
1977-1978 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon Northland
1983-1991 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1994-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XL HD
1984-1989,1991-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1992-1996 Ford E-350 Econoline Club Wagon XLT HD
1975-1976 Ford Elite Base
1973-1974 Ford F-100 Base
1976-1978 Ford F-150 Base
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-150 XLT
1973-1974,1976-1978,1983-1986 Ford F-250 Base
1975-1979,1987-1992 Ford F-250 Custom
1995-1996 Ford F-250 Eddie Bauer
1975-1978 Ford F-250 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger XLT
1995-1996 Ford F-250 Special
1983-1996 Ford F-250 XL
1983 Ford F-250 XLS
1977,1983-1984,1993-1996 Ford F-250 XLT
1985-1992 Ford F-250 XLT Lariat
1997 Ford F-250 HD XL
1997 Ford F-250 HD XLT
1973-1974,1976-1978,1983-1986,1997 Ford F-350 Base
1975-1979,1987-1992 Ford F-350 Custom
1995 Ford F-350 Eddie Bauer
1975-1978 Ford F-350 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-350 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-350 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-350 Ranger XLT
1995-1996 Ford F-350 Special
1983-1997 Ford F-350 XL
1983 Ford F-350 XLS
1977,1983-1984,1993-1997 Ford F-350 XLT
1985-1992 Ford F-350 XLT Lariat
1970 Ford Fairlane 500
1970 Ford Falcon Base
1970 Ford Falcon Futura
1969-1974 Ford Galaxie 500 Base
1969-1970 Ford Galaxie 500 XL
1972-1976 Ford Gran Torino Base
1974-1976 Ford Gran Torino Brougham
1974-1975 Ford Gran Torino Elite
1972-1975 Ford Gran Torino Sport
1972-1976 Ford Gran Torino Squire
1969-1978 Ford LTD Base
1970-1976 Ford LTD Brougham
1975-1978 Ford LTD Country Squire
1975-1978 Ford LTD Landau
1970-1971 Ford Mustang Base
1970 Ford Mustang Boss 429
1970-1971 Ford Mustang Grande
1970-1971 Ford Mustang Mach 1
1970 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-500
1969-1974 Ford Ranch Wagon Base
1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Police Cruiser
1970-1977 Ford Ranchero 500
1970-1971 Ford Ranchero Base
1970-1977 Ford Ranchero GT
1970-1976 Ford Ranchero Squire
1968-1976 Ford Thunderbird Base
1971 Ford Torino 500
1970-1976 Ford Torino Base
1970-1971 Ford Torino Brougham
1970-1971 Ford Torino Cobra
1970-1971 Ford Torino GT
1970-1971 Ford Torino Squire
1970-1971 Ford Torino Super Cobra Jet
1968-1978 Lincoln Continental Base
1968-1971 Lincoln Mark III Base
1972-1976 Lincoln Mark IV Base
1977-1978 Lincoln Mark V Base
1969-1974 Mercury Colony Park Base
1970-1971,1973 Mercury Cougar Base
1970 Mercury Cougar Cobra Jet
1970-1971,1973-1976 Mercury Cougar XR-7
1969-1971 Mercury Cyclone Base
1969 Mercury Cyclone CJ
1970-1971 Mercury Cyclone GT
1969-1971 Mercury Cyclone Spoiler
1975-1978 Mercury Grand Marquis Base
1969-1970 Mercury Marauder Base
1969-1970 Mercury Marauder X-100
1969-1978 Mercury Marquis Base
1969-1978 Mercury Marquis Brougham
1975-1976 Mercury Marquis Colony Park
1970-1974,1976 Mercury Montego Base
1975 Mercury Montego Brougham
1972-1973 Mercury Montego GT
1970-1976 Mercury Montego MX
1970-1974,1976 Mercury Montego MX Brougham
1976 Mercury Montego MX Villager
1970-1975 Mercury Montego Villager
1969-1974 Mercury Monterey Base
1969-1974 Mercury Monterey Custom
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 99340164343

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
C. Witt
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 4
Heavy Duty Paper Towel Holder
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel, Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
Nice looking, heavy duty paper towel holder. Looks like it'll be durable. The top did have a couple of dark, tarnished looking spots but it's not too noticeable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2023
H
Verified Purchase
Hunter Hart
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Free Mini-Screwdriver + microfiber cloth? Thank you
Color: Gold, Material Type: Stainless Steel
100% worth the purchase mainly for the little screwdriver (a real one, just small) and microfiber cloth included. As long as you install it correctly it all holds together very well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Connie
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
I love it. It holds the jumbo rolls and that makes it a perfect kitchennitem
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Douglas
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
The Best Book on the Creation-Evolution Debate
Format: Paperback
“The book The Evolution of Adam is an accessible study of the hermeneutical issues involved in reading Genesis and Paul on Adam in view of evolution.” - Peter Enns In my opinion The Evolution of Adam by Peter Enns is the best book available on the evolution versus creation debate because it goes right to the heart of the matter. Christians grossly misunderstand the creation stories in Genesis because they read them from a modern point of view. The first part of the book deals with Adam in Genesis. The second part of the book deals with Paul's Adam in Romans. The book is short and very well written for the popular audience. PART 1 ADAM IN GENESIS Many stories in the Old Testament have parallels with other Ancient Near Eastern stories. The Adam story is no different as it has strong similarities to Atrahasis. If I may quote Enns, “Israel's creation story was written to say something about their place in the world and the God they worshiped. To think that the Israelites, alone among all other ancient peoples, were interested in (or capable of) giving some definitive, quasi-scientific, account of human origins is an absurd logic. And to read the story of Adam and Eve as if it were set up to so such a thing is simply wrongheaded. It strains credulity to think that, of all the ancient peoples with origins stories, Israel alone escaped this story-telling mentality and gave us something approximating 'history' or 'science' in the modern sense.” The Evolution of Adam shows conclusively that, “the Adam story in Genesis is part of Israel’s literature of national and religious self-definition, not the origin of humanity.” The Adam story is not concerned with human origins as most Christians assume. Adam is Israel. Israel’s history as a nation can be broken down as follows:   1. Israel is “created” by God at the exodus through a cosmic battle (gods are defeated and the Red Sea is “divided”);   2. The Israelites are given Canaan to inhabit, a lush land flowing with milk and honey;   3. They remain in the land as long as they obey the Mosaic law;   4. They persist in a pattern of disobedience and are exiled to Babylon. Israel’s history parallels Adam’s drama in Genesis:   1. Adam is created in Genesis 2 after the taming of chaos in Genesis 1;   2. Adam is placed in a lush garden;   3. Law (not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil) is given as a stipulation for remaining in the garden;   4. Adam and Eve disobey and are exiled. PART 2 PAUL'S ADAM Paul’s use of the Adam story, like Paul’s other uses of the Old Testament, is marked by creativity and the prior conviction that Jesus is God’s unexpected solution to a universal plight. Enns' summary of Paul's Adam in Romans 5:12-21 is as follows: 1. Adam is hardly mentioned in the Old Testament. 2. Some see Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David as “new Adams.” Paul represents Jesus as a new Adam. 3. The Fall of man is not taught in the Old Testament. 4. The Fall of man is not taught in the Garden scene. The imputation of Adam’s sin is not taught in the garden story. 5. The Adam/Jesus Parallel in Romans 5 is both clear and not so clear. What does Paul mean when he says that through Adam’s sin, “death came to all, because all sinned.” One might have expected Paul to say, “because Adam sinned” (death is Adam’s fault). 6. Paul’s Jesus/Adam parallel does not stem from a “plain reading” of Genesis. It is selective and theologically driven. The Book of Romans is not about personal salvation, but about the Jew/Gentile relationship. 7. Paul was an ancient man and he had an ancient view of human origins. 8. Paul used the Old Testament in creative ways that violate the grammatical-historical-contextual approach. So he could be doing the same with Adam. 9. Adam was used creatively in Second Temple Jewish literature (Paul’s contemporaries). CONCLUSION Evolution and creation are not in conflict because the early chapters of Genesis have nothing to do with HOW God created the world or the first humans. Therefore science can be studied freely for what it is and the Old Testament can be understood as ancient Israel's story. If I may quote Enns again, “The root of the conflict over evolution and creation for many Christians is not scientific or even theological, but group identity and fear of losing what it offers. The challenge of evolution is here to stay, and its effect on how Christians read Genesis and Paul must be addressed deliberately.” “Evangelicals tend to focus on how to protect the Bible against the attacks of evolution. The real challenge before them is to reorient their expectation of what the story of Adam and Eve is actually prepared to deliver.” If you are looking to solve the evolution-creation debate in your mind then the Evolution of Adam is the book to read. Evolution and creation are both true. God created through evolution. The Bible is not a modern science book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2012
W
Verified Purchase
William M. Victor
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 4
Thoughtful book on the purpose of the Creation accounts
Format: Paperback
This book provides a very good introduction into how the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was most likely formed. It takes very seriously the environment that may have shaped the Pentateuch. It also provides a good primer into how Paul read the Hebrew Bible: through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. If the reader of the Bible understands the purpose behind the creation narratives then there appears to be less conflict with scientific explanations for the origins of the universe and even humanity. I was expecting this book to do something that Enns never claims he was setting out to do, that is give an alternative understanding of the origins of sin and death while taking Paul's account in Romans 5 seriously. Enns claims that Paul interpreted the Adam story in a way that he interpreted other accounts of the Hebrew Bible, through a Christological lens but with little regard to historical context. To Enns, Paul was a man of his time and just because Paul, a man uninformed by scientific explanations of the universe, understood Adam as a historical person doesn't mean those of us who are informed need to see it the same way. Enns values Paul's Christocentric lens on the Hebrew Bible, but comes just short of calling Paul wrong on his understanding of the origin of sin and death. If you are working through the issue of integration/synthesizing scientific thoughts on the origins of the universe and humanity (as well as trying to come to grips with the purpose of the Creation accounts in Genesis) this book will serve you well. If you are expecting Enns to provide that integration/synthesis for you, you will be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2012

recommand products