Pay in installments of $9.94 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 19 - Aug 24
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Gil Evans: New Bottle, Old Wine - VINYL LPTitle: New Bottle, Old Wine Artist: Gil Evans Label: Blue Note Records Product Type: VINYL LP UPC: 602577280894 Genre: Jazz Release Date: 2019 05 17 Number of Discs: 1 Additional Details: 180 GRAM VINYL Limited 180gm audiophile vinyl LP pressing in deluxe gatefold packaging. The album, recorded in 1958 and originally released via World Pacific, by Gil Evans one of the most innovative arrangers in jazz. Evans' orchestra on this session is packed with a
Title: New Bottle, Old WineArtist: Gil Evans
Label: Blue Note Records
Product Type: VINYL LP
UPC: 602577280894
Genre: Jazz
Release Date: 2019-05-17
Number of Discs: 1
Additional Details: 180 GRAM VINYL
Limited 180gm audiophile vinyl LP pressing in deluxe gatefold packaging. The album, recorded in 1958 and originally released via World Pacific, by Gil Evans - one of the most innovative arrangers in jazz. Evans' orchestra on this session is packed with a superb set of players, including Cannonball Adderley Art Blakey, Paul Chambers and Johnny Coles. Sourced from a previously unknown analog stereo master, the incredible session comes in the highest fidelity on this Tone Poet LP. Blue Note Records' Tone Poet Audiophile Vinyl Reissue Series is produced by Joe Harley and features all-analog, mastered-from-the-original-master-tape.
Tracks:
1.1 St. Louis Blues
1.2 King Porter Stomp
1.3 Willow Tree
1.4 Struttin' with Some Barbecue
1.5 Lester Leaps in
1.6 'Round Midnight
1.7 Manteca
1.8 Bird Feathers
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Really comfortable, good fit
Size: 6X-Large, Color: 5 Pack(black,black,blue,blue,light Coffee)
These are very lightweight and comfortable. The material stretches freely and doesn't bind up anywhere. If you go by the size guide, they should fit perfectly neither too loose nor too tight. Would definitely recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2026
★★★★★ 3
These don't work for me...
Size: Medium, Color: B005
First the good... I like the material; it's very soft, light, and stretchy. I also like the colors, but that's all I like about these boyshort panties. My main goal for panties is to have them NOT ride up into my butt crack leaving the bottoms of my butt hanging out. It's probably comfortable for some, but it drives me nuts to feel this constant need to pull them out of my butt crack and down over my butt cheeks. If I wanted my butt hanging out I'd buy thongs, LOL. The part I really don't understand, is why they make the front and the back the same width/length. I mean clearly more material would be needed in the back to fit around two round humps, right? I mean I guess unless you have what I call a pancake butt, I don't see why there shouldn't be more material on the backside of the underwear. Why is it so dang difficult to find underwear in this style to fit up over butt cheeks? If I pull them down enough to cover the bottoms of my cheeks then the waistband is sitting right at the top of my crack which is extremely annoying (then I feel this constant need to pull them up!) especially when the front is long enough to go up to my belly button!! Who are they making these underwear for??? Ladies with FLAT butts apparently. For reference, I'm 5'5" 130 lbs, hips 37", waist 27", athletic build, as in lean but with muscular glutes & quads from speed skating. Not only are they not made big enough to go up over my rump while still keeping my cheek bottoms from hanging out, but they're too long in the front cause they constantly roll up in the front. I've even tried turning them around, even though they seem to be exactly the same front to back, and they fit exactly the same, no surprise there. I may just be out of luck finding comfy boyshort panties that actually fit the way I want them to. :/
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Super comfy!
Great colors, super comfy, soft and druable!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Comfy and well made
Size: Large, Color: B2207sp
Love these! They stay in place, are soft and comfortable with just enough stretch but hold their shape. This is my 3rd order.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Super soft and comfortable!
I haven't bought new underwear in forever. I used to wear thongs, but now find them incredibly uncomfortable. The last few times I've tried to buy new underwear, the sizing was either way off (I'm a medium, but gave up after having to return them for a large and then extra large) or the quality was horrible (two brands stretch waaaay out and they can fall down while wearing them (I have larger ass-ets, so they shouldn't start to slide down during use). I tried these after buying some bamboo pyjamas and I love them! They are incredibly soft, comfortable, and stretchy. I can use them all day, and they work well, whether I'm lounging on the couch or wearing them under my spandex shorts at the gym, they don't ride up or slide down. They are both comfortable and look sexy, while providing support in all the right places. I haven't had them too long, so I can't speak on the durability, but they appear to be of good quality and I plan to order more, this time without the band.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2025